The Honor X7d and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both devices leverage Qualcomm's Snapdragon 6-series, but diverge in their approach to battery technology and charging speeds. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a slightly more mature software ecosystem, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the winner. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the Honor X7d's 35W, and the similar battery endurance ratings mean less time tethered to a wall. However, the X7d offers a competitive CPU.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 24 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 24 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.9 x 76.8 x 8.2 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Scratch-resistant glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1610 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~261 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz, 850 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, Magic OS 9 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired
7.5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Velvet Black, Desert Gold | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 140 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor X7d
- Potentially better single-core CPU performance due to newer Cortex-A78 cores.
- Competitive price point.
- 6nm process for good power efficiency.
- Significantly slower 35W charging.
- Limited camera information suggests a less emphasized camera system.
- Missing display specifications.
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- 67W fast charging with PD3.0 and QC3.
- Integrated 5G modem for faster data speeds.
- Established software ecosystem and support.
- Slightly older CPU architecture.
- Potentially less single-core performance.
- Display specs are limited.
Display Comparison
Both the Honor X7d and Poco X4 Pro 5G share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing for the X7d. The Poco X4 Pro 5G's display, while also lacking detailed specs, benefits from Xiaomi's established display calibration expertise. Without further data on the X7d, the Poco X4 Pro 5G likely offers a more refined visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing features. This makes a direct comparison difficult. The absence of information on the X7d's camera system suggests it may not be a primary selling point. Xiaomi's Poco line often emphasizes camera capabilities, and the X4 Pro 5G likely benefits from more sophisticated image processing algorithms and potentially a larger main sensor, though specifics are unavailable.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G utilizes the Snapdragon 695 5G, featuring 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. The Honor X7d counters with the Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, boasting 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While clock speeds suggest a slight edge for the X7d, the Cortex-A78 cores represent a more modern architecture, potentially offering better single-core performance. However, the 695's integrated 5G modem is a key advantage for users in areas with 5G coverage. Both phones utilize a 6nm process, suggesting similar power efficiency, but the architectural differences could lead to varying performance profiles in demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Poco X4 Pro 5G supports 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3, achieving 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. The Honor X7d is limited to 35W wired charging and 7.5W reverse wired charging. This significant difference in charging speed gives the Poco X4 Pro 5G a substantial advantage for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X7d if you prioritize a newer CPU architecture and are comfortable with a slower charging experience. It's ideal for users who value a balance between performance and affordability. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you prioritize fast charging, a proven track record of battery life, and a more established software experience. This phone is best for users who are always on the go and need to quickly top up their battery.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with stable frame rates. Genshin Impact may require lower settings to maintain smooth gameplay. While not a dedicated gaming chipset, it provides a reasonable gaming experience for casual gamers.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between 35W and 67W? Will I notice a real-world difference?
The difference is substantial. 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G can take a phone from 0% to 70% in just 22 minutes, and fully charge it in 41 minutes. The Honor X7d's 35W charging will take considerably longer, potentially doubling the full charge time. This is a major convenience factor for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Poco X4 Pro 5G useful if I don't currently have 5G coverage in my area?
Even without immediate 5G coverage, the Poco X4 Pro 5G's 5G modem future-proofs the device. As 5G networks expand, you'll be ready to take advantage of faster data speeds. Additionally, the modem often offers improved 4G LTE performance compared to older modems.
❓ What kind of software experience can I expect from each phone? Is one easier to use or more customizable?
The Poco X4 Pro 5G runs Xiaomi's MIUI, which is feature-rich and highly customizable, but can also be perceived as bloated by some users. The Honor X7d runs Magic UI, which is based on Android but offers a cleaner, more streamlined experience. Both offer regular software updates, but Xiaomi generally has a faster update cycle.
