The Honor X7d 4G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The X7d prioritizes battery endurance with a power-efficient Snapdragon chipset, while the Redmi Note 11R opts for a more powerful, though potentially less efficient, Dimensity processor. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and consistent performance, the Honor X7d 4G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 685 chipset, coupled with a remarkable 71-hour endurance rating, provides a more reliable experience than the Redmi Note 11R's Dimensity 700, despite the latter's theoretical performance advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 25 | 2022, September 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 15 | Available. Released 2022, September 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.9 x 76.8 x 8.2 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Tempered glass, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1610 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~261 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Desert Gold, Ocean Cyan, Meteor Silver, Velvet Black | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Models | LGN-LX1 | 22095RA98C |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 71:00h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Honor X7d 4G
- Exceptional 71-hour battery endurance
- Power-efficient Snapdragon 685 chipset
- Faster 35W wired charging
- Long-lasting battery with 1600 charge cycles
- Potentially lower peak CPU performance compared to the Redmi Note 11R
- Likely a basic display panel
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R
- More powerful Dimensity 700 chipset for occasional gaming
- Potentially better image processing with MediaTek ISP
- Competitive price point
- Faster single-core performance
- Slower 18W wired charging
- Likely shorter battery life compared to the Honor X7d 4G
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific display specs are missing, both likely feature LCD panels common in this price bracket. The focus here is on processing power, not visual fidelity. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will be standard for the segment. The absence of high refresh rates or advanced panel technologies like LTPO is expected.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the price point, both phones likely employ similar sensor configurations, potentially with a primary sensor around 13-50MP. The Redmi Note 11R might benefit from MediaTek’s image signal processor (ISP), potentially offering slightly better image processing capabilities. However, the quality of the image will largely depend on software optimization. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic and offers limited practical value.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm) features a more potent CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores alongside 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the Honor X7d 4G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6nm) with 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. However, the Snapdragon 685’s 6nm process node offers superior power efficiency. This translates to less heat generation and potentially more sustained performance under load. While the Redmi Note 11R may show a slight edge in benchmark scores, the X7d’s architecture is optimized for efficiency, benefiting everyday tasks and extending battery life. The Redmi Note 11R's CPU architecture, with its Cortex-A76 cores, will provide a more noticeable boost in single-core performance, useful for app launch times.
Battery Life
The Honor X7d 4G truly shines in this category. Its 71-hour endurance rating is exceptional for a budget smartphone, indicating a significant advantage in real-world usage. While the Redmi Note 11R’s battery capacity is not specified, the Snapdragon 685’s efficiency and the X7d’s 1600 charge cycles suggest a longer lifespan. The Redmi Note 11R’s 18W charging is considerably slower than the Honor X7d 4G’s 35W charging, meaning a significantly longer time to reach 100% battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X7d 4G if you need exceptional battery life, reliable everyday performance for social media, messaging, and light tasks, and value long-term device longevity with its 1600 charge cycles. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R if you prioritize slightly faster processing speeds for occasional gaming or demanding apps, and are willing to compromise on battery endurance and potentially charging speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 700 in the Redmi Note 11R overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 700 is a capable chipset, but its 7nm process isn't as efficient as the Snapdragon 685's 6nm node. While it won't necessarily overheat, you may experience more noticeable thermal throttling during extended gaming, leading to reduced performance over time. The Honor X7d 4G is likely to maintain more consistent performance due to its superior thermal efficiency.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Honor X7d 4G with the 35W charger?
With 35W charging, the Honor X7d 4G should be able to charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 60-75 minutes, significantly faster than the Redmi Note 11R's 18W charging. This faster charging speed is a major convenience factor for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the difference in CPU performance between the Snapdragon 685 and Dimensity 700 noticeable in everyday tasks?
For typical smartphone usage – browsing, social media, messaging – the difference in CPU performance is unlikely to be significant. Both chipsets are more than capable of handling these tasks smoothly. The Dimensity 700 might offer a slight edge in app launch times, but the Snapdragon 685’s efficiency will contribute to a more responsive overall experience.
