The Honor X7d 4G and Xiaomi Poco M5 represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, they take distinctly different approaches. The X7d prioritizes exceptional battery endurance, while the Poco M5 focuses on a more modern chipset and display. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day battery life and longevity, the Honor X7d 4G is the clear winner. Its 71-hour endurance rating and 1600 cycle battery life significantly outperform the Poco M5’s 121 hours. However, the Poco M5 offers a more powerful processor for gaming and a brighter display.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 25 | 2022, September 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 15 | Available. Released 2022, September 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.9 x 76.8 x 8.2 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Tempered glass, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1610 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~261 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Desert Gold, Ocean Cyan, Meteor Silver, Velvet Black | Black, Green, Yellow |
| Models | LGN-LX1 | 22071219CG |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.04 W/kg (head) 0.83 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 0.83 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 121h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1363:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 386311 (v9)
GeekBench: 1896 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 71:00h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Honor X7d 4G
- Exceptional 71-hour battery life
- Impressive 1600 battery cycle lifespan
- Faster 35W wired charging
- Unknown display specifications (brightness, panel type)
- Less powerful processor compared to Poco M5
Xiaomi Poco M5
- More powerful Mediatek Helio G99 processor
- Brighter 448 nit display
- Modern CPU architecture (Cortex-A76)
- Significantly shorter battery life (121 hours)
- Slower 18W wired charging
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Poco M5 boasts a brighter display, reaching 448 nits, compared to an unlisted brightness for the Honor X7d 4G. Both share a 1363:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar color depth and black levels. However, the lack of information regarding the X7d’s panel technology (LCD vs. AMOLED) and refresh rate puts it at a disadvantage. The Poco M5’s higher brightness will be more visible outdoors, while the X7d’s display characteristics remain unknown, potentially impacting viewing quality in various lighting conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of information suggests neither phone is positioned as a camera-centric device. It’s reasonable to assume both will perform adequately in good lighting conditions, but struggle in low-light scenarios. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Poco M5 is likely a marketing feature with limited practical benefit, given the inherent limitations of such small sensors.
Performance
The Poco M5’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) and its CPU configuration of 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 offer a performance edge over the Honor X7d 4G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6nm) with its 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. While both are 6nm chips, the Cortex-A76 cores in the Poco M5 are architecturally superior to the A73 cores in the Honor, translating to faster application loading and smoother multitasking. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Snapdragon 685 prioritizes efficiency, potentially contributing to the X7d’s superior battery life.
Battery Life
The Honor X7d 4G dominates in battery endurance with a remarkable 71-hour rating and a battery cycle life of 1600, indicating exceptional longevity. The Poco M5, with its 121-hour endurance, falls significantly behind. While the Poco M5’s Helio G99 is more efficient than older Mediatek chips, the X7d’s larger battery and optimized power management clearly win. The X7d also supports 35W wired charging, considerably faster than the Poco M5’s 18W charging, reducing 0-100% charge times.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X7d 4G if you need a phone that will reliably last through two full days of moderate use, or if you frequently travel and have limited access to charging. Its focus on battery health with 1600 cycles also promises longer-term usability. Buy the Xiaomi Poco M5 if you prioritize gaming performance and a more vibrant viewing experience, and are willing to compromise on ultimate battery endurance and longevity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How does the Snapdragon 685 in the Honor X7d 4G handle graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Snapdragon 685 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, it will likely require lower graphics settings and frame rates for a smooth experience. The Helio G99 in the Poco M5 offers a more substantial performance boost for gaming, allowing for higher settings and potentially more stable frame rates.
❓ Is the 1600 battery cycle lifespan of the Honor X7d 4G a significant advantage over the Poco M5?
Yes, absolutely. A battery cycle represents a full charge and discharge. The X7d’s 1600 cycle rating suggests the battery will retain a significant portion of its capacity even after years of regular use, delaying the need for a battery replacement. The Poco M5’s cycle life is not specified, implying a lower expected lifespan.
❓ Does the Poco M5 support any form of fast charging beyond its 18W rating?
No, the Poco M5 is officially rated for 18W wired charging. While it might be compatible with chargers offering higher wattage, it will only draw up to 18W, limiting the charging speed. The Honor X7d 4G’s 35W charging provides a significantly faster top-up.
