The Honor X7d 4G and Samsung Galaxy A23 5G represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both devices utilize Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets and aim for affordability, they diverge significantly in battery endurance and 5G connectivity. This comparison dissects these differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a smooth, reliable experience for everyday tasks, the Honor X7d 4G emerges as the winner. Its 71-hour endurance rating dwarfs the Galaxy A23 5G’s 138 hours, and the Snapdragon 685 provides sufficient power for most users. The A23 5G’s 5G connectivity is its main advantage, but comes at the cost of significantly reduced battery performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 2, 5, 30, 66, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 25 | 2022, August 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 15 | Available. Released 2022, September 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.9 x 76.8 x 8.2 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Tempered glass, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1610 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~261 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz | PLS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - USA
8 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - International |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Desert Gold, Ocean Cyan, Meteor Silver, Velvet Black | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | LGN-LX1 | SM-A236U, SM-A236U1, SM-A236B, SM-A236B/DS, SM-A236B/DSN, SM-A236E, SM-S236DL |
| Price | About 150 EUR | $ 84.44 / £ 129.00 / € 125.28 / ₹ 21,000 |
| SAR | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.57 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.49 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 138h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1328:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318821 (v9)
GeekBench: 1940 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 71:00h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Honor X7d 4G
- Exceptional 71-hour battery life
- Faster 35W wired charging
- Potentially more efficient CPU architecture
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Display specifications are unknown
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Brighter display (508 nits)
- Higher CPU clock speeds
- Significantly shorter battery life (138 hours)
- Slower 25W wired charging
- 2MP macro camera offers limited value
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 508 nits and a 1328:1 contrast ratio, offering a visually acceptable experience. However, the Honor X7d 4G’s display specifications are not provided, suggesting a more basic panel. While the A23 5G’s contrast ratio is respectable, the lack of information regarding the X7d’s panel technology (e.g., IPS, TFT) makes a direct comparison difficult. The A23’s higher brightness will be noticeable in direct sunlight, but the X7d’s potential for lower power consumption could offset this.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without information on sensor size, aperture, or image processing algorithms, a meaningful comparison is challenging. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A23 5G is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, and should be considered a marketing feature rather than a substantial upgrade. The larger sensor, if present on either device, will generally capture more light and produce better low-light images.
Performance
Both phones utilize 6nm Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets, but the Galaxy A23 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G offers a slight performance edge over the Honor X7d 4G’s Snapdragon 685. The A23 5G’s CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver – is clocked higher than the X7d’s 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking on the A23 5G. However, the X7d’s Cortex-A73 cores, while slower clocked, are architecturally more powerful than the A23’s Kryo 660 Silver cores, potentially offering better sustained performance in demanding tasks. The 5G modem in the A23 5G also adds to its power consumption.
Battery Life
The Honor X7d 4G’s standout feature is its exceptional 71-hour endurance rating, achieved with a battery size not specified. This is dramatically higher than the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G’s 138-hour endurance. The X7d also supports 35W wired charging, significantly faster than the A23 5G’s 25W charging. While the A23 5G’s 5G connectivity is a benefit, it comes at a substantial cost to battery life. The X7d’s longer endurance and faster charging make it the clear winner for users prioritizing battery performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X7d 4G if you need a phone that can reliably last through two full days of moderate use, and don't require the latest 5G network speeds. It’s ideal for travelers, commuters, or anyone who dislikes frequent charging. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G if you prioritize future-proofing with 5G connectivity and a slightly brighter display, and are willing to compromise on battery life and potentially carry a power bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Galaxy A23 5G offer a noticeable gaming improvement over the Snapdragon 685 in the Honor X7d 4G?
While the Snapdragon 695 has a more powerful GPU, the difference in gaming performance will be most noticeable in graphically demanding titles at higher settings. For casual gaming, the Snapdragon 685 in the X7d 4G will provide a perfectly adequate experience. However, the A23 5G will likely maintain higher frame rates and smoother gameplay in more intensive games.
❓ How much faster is the 35W charging on the Honor X7d 4G compared to the 25W charging on the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G?
The 35W charging on the X7d 4G will significantly reduce charging times. While exact 0-100% times aren't available, expect the X7d to charge considerably faster, potentially shaving off 30-60 minutes compared to the A23 5G. This is a substantial benefit for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G worth the trade-off in battery life?
That depends on your location and 5G network availability. If you live in an area with widespread and reliable 5G coverage and frequently use data-intensive applications, the 5G connectivity may be worthwhile. However, if 5G is limited or you primarily use Wi-Fi, the significantly longer battery life of the Honor X7d 4G is likely a more valuable feature.
