The Honor X7d 4G and Oppo A57s represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this. The X7d leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 685, while the A57s opts for MediaTek’s Helio G35. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and longevity, the Honor X7d 4G emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 685 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a noticeable advantage in processing power and battery efficiency compared to the Oppo A57s’ Helio G35.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 25 | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 15 | Available. Released 2022, September 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Panda Glass), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.9 x 76.8 x 8.2 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| | - | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Tempered glass, Mohs level 4 | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1610 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~261 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 69 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Desert Gold, Ocean Cyan, Meteor Silver, Velvet Black | Starry Black, Sky Blue |
| Models | LGN-LX1 | CPH2385 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | - |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 71:00h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Honor X7d 4G
- Superior chipset performance with Snapdragon 685
- Excellent battery endurance (71 hours)
- Long-lasting battery health (1600 cycles)
- Charging speed is only marginally faster than Oppo A57s
- Display specs are unknown, potentially average
Oppo A57s
- Fast 33W charging (100% in 69 minutes)
- Potentially lower price point
- Streamlined user experience (typical of Oppo)
- Inferior chipset performance with Helio G35
- Less efficient 12nm process
- Shorter battery life compared to Honor X7d
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing, the focus here is on performance. The absence of high refresh rates on both suggests a focus on power efficiency. The difference in chipset efficiency will likely have a greater impact on perceived smoothness than any minor display variations.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price bracket, it’s safe to assume both phones feature modest camera setups. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is likely more for marketing than practical use. Image processing will be a key differentiator, but without sample images, it’s difficult to assess. The Snapdragon 685’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally more capable than the Helio G35’s, potentially leading to better image quality in challenging conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor X7d 4G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6nm) is a significant step up from the Oppo A57s’ MediaTek Helio G35 (12nm). The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 685 translates to better thermal efficiency and power consumption. The Snapdragon 685’s CPU configuration – 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 – provides a more powerful core cluster than the A57s’ 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53. This means the X7d will handle demanding apps and multitasking with less lag. The Helio G35, while adequate for basic tasks, will struggle with more intensive workloads.
Battery Life
The Honor X7d 4G claims an impressive 71-hour endurance and 1600 charge cycles, suggesting a focus on long-term battery health. While the Oppo A57s doesn’t provide endurance figures, it compensates with 33W wired charging, achieving 100% charge in 69 minutes. The X7d’s 35W charging is slightly faster, but the larger battery and superior chipset efficiency likely mean the X7d will still offer longer overall usage time between charges. The 1600 charge cycle claim for the X7d is a significant advantage, indicating a battery designed to last.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X7d 4G if you need a phone capable of handling multitasking, moderate gaming, and demanding applications with greater ease. Its superior chipset and battery endurance make it ideal for users who rely heavily on their smartphones throughout the day. Buy the Oppo A57s if you prioritize fast charging and a slightly more streamlined user experience, and your usage primarily revolves around basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media browsing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G35 in the Oppo A57s struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the MediaTek Helio G35 is a basic chipset. While it can run PUBG Mobile, you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings significantly to achieve playable frame rates. Expect stuttering and lag during intense moments. The Snapdragon 685 in the Honor X7d 4G will provide a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ How does the 6nm process of the Snapdragon 685 impact the Honor X7d 4G’s battery life in real-world usage?
The 6nm process is significantly more power-efficient than the 12nm process used in the Helio G35. This means the Snapdragon 685 consumes less power for the same level of performance, resulting in longer battery life. You’ll notice this in everyday tasks like browsing, streaming video, and using social media. The Honor X7d 4G’s claimed 71-hour endurance reflects this efficiency.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Oppo A57s fast enough to offset the smaller battery capacity (compared to the X7d)?
While 33W charging is relatively fast, the Honor X7d 4G’s superior chipset efficiency and longer battery endurance provide a more substantial benefit. The A57s’ faster charging is convenient, but the X7d will likely still offer more total usage time between charges, even accounting for the slightly slower charging speed.
