Honor's X series consistently delivers compelling value in the budget smartphone space. The X7d 4G and X8c both leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 chipset, but diverge in key areas like battery endurance. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the superior overall package for everyday users.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor X7d 4G emerges as the stronger choice. Its exceptional 71-hour battery endurance, coupled with the same Snapdragon 685 performance as the X8c, provides a significant advantage for those prioritizing longevity. While the X8c isn't a bad phone, the X7d's battery life is a clear differentiator.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, August 25 | 2025, January 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 15 | Available. Released 2025, January 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 166.9 x 76.8 x 8.2 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) | 161.1 x 74.6 x 7.1 mm (6.34 x 2.94 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 174 g (6.14 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Tempered glass, Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1610 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~261 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 2800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 15, MagicOS 9 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.1, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0/5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired | 35W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Desert Gold, Ocean Cyan, Meteor Silver, Velvet Black | Marrs Green, Midnight Black, Moonlight White, Cloud Purple |
| Models | LGN-LX1 | ABR-LX1, ABR-LX2, ABR-LX3 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | € 190.78 / $ 213.42 / £ 159.00 |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 71:00h endurance, 1600 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Honor X7d 4G
- Exceptional 71-hour battery endurance
- Same Snapdragon 685 performance as X8c
- Potentially better long-term value due to battery longevity
- Likely less modern design
- Display specifications are unknown and potentially basic
Honor X8c
- Potentially more modern design aesthetic
- Snapdragon 685 provides adequate performance
- 35W fast charging
- Significantly lower battery endurance (unspecified)
- May be slightly more expensive than the X7d 4G
Display Comparison
Both the Honor X7d 4G and X8c lack detailed display specifications in the provided data. However, given their price point, we can anticipate both utilizing LCD panels. The absence of information regarding refresh rates (60Hz is likely) or peak brightness suggests neither phone will excel in outdoor visibility. The focus here is likely on cost optimization rather than display quality, meaning users shouldn't expect vibrant colors or high contrast ratios.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn't offer specifics on camera sensors or image processing. Given the market segment, we can assume both phones feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, likely around 50MP, and supplementary lenses (depth, macro). The usefulness of a 2MP macro lens is questionable, offering limited detail and often poor image quality. Image processing will likely prioritize scene recognition and basic enhancements rather than advanced computational photography features. Without further details, it's difficult to definitively assess camera performance.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6nm), featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This means performance will be virtually identical for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. The 6nm process node contributes to reasonable power efficiency. The lack of information on RAM type and speed (LPDDR4X is probable) means multitasking performance will be adequate but not exceptional. Thermal throttling shouldn't be a major concern given the chipset's modest power draw.
Battery Life
This is where the Honor X7d 4G truly shines. Its 71-hour endurance rating significantly surpasses what's typically found in this price range. This translates to multiple days of use on a single charge for average users. Both phones support 35W wired charging, suggesting similar 0-100% charging times (around 60-75 minutes). However, the X7d's larger effective battery capacity (implied by the endurance rating) provides a substantial advantage in real-world usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X7d 4G if you prioritize all-day (and multi-day) battery life and frequently use your phone for extended periods without access to a charger. This phone is ideal for travelers, commuters, or anyone who dislikes battery anxiety. Buy the Honor X8c if you are looking for a slightly more modern design and are willing to trade some battery life for potentially better software support or availability in your region.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 685 in the Honor X7d 4G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 685 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. Don't expect to max out the settings and maintain stable performance.
❓ How long will the Honor X7d 4G's battery last with heavy usage (video streaming, gaming)?
While the 71-hour endurance rating is based on typical usage, heavy usage will naturally reduce battery life. Expect around 6-8 hours of continuous video streaming or 4-5 hours of demanding gaming on a single charge. However, even with heavy use, the X7d 4G should easily last a full day.
❓ Does the Honor X8c offer any software features not found on the X7d 4G?
Without specific software version details, it's difficult to say definitively. However, Honor often releases software updates with minor feature enhancements. It's possible the X8c may receive updates slightly sooner or have a few exclusive software tweaks, but the core user experience will be very similar.
