The Honor X7c 4G and Samsung Galaxy A24 4G represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential features without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The X7c prioritizes a fast-charging experience paired with a Qualcomm chipset, while the A24 focuses on display brightness and a MediaTek Helio G99 processor. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a brighter, more vibrant display and a generally smoother user experience, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G is the better choice. While the Honor X7c boasts faster 35W charging, the A24’s superior display and slightly more efficient processor outweigh this advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 18 | 2023, April 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 18 | Available. Released 2023, May 05 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.9 x 76.8 x 8.1 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) | 162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3 mm (6.38 x 3.06 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g or 196 g (6.84 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Tempered glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1610 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~261 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5200/6000 mAh (market/region dependent) | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Forest Green, Moonlight White | Black, Lime Green, Blue gradient, Dark red |
| Models | ALT-LX2 | SM-A245F, SM-A245F/DS, SM-A245F/DSN, SM-A245M, SM-A245M/DS, SM-A245N |
| Price | - | About 150 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.41 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Honor X7c 4G
- Faster 35W wired charging
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset offers good efficiency
- Likely dimmer display compared to the A24
- Less powerful CPU architecture for demanding tasks
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
- Brighter 1012 nit display for excellent outdoor visibility
- More powerful MediaTek Helio G99 processor
- Longer battery endurance (141h rating)
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Samsung’s One UI can be resource intensive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G immediately stands out with its significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1012 nits. This is a substantial advantage over what we’d expect from the Honor X7c, making the A24 far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the X7c’s panel specifications aren’t available, it’s likely to be dimmer. Both devices utilize LCD technology, but the A24’s brightness and color reproduction will provide a more immersive viewing experience for media consumption and gaming. Bezels are comparable on both devices, suggesting neither offers a particularly premium aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are expected to offer competent, but not exceptional, camera systems. The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G’s camera specifications are not detailed enough to provide a full analysis, but it’s reasonable to assume a primary sensor around 50MP. The Honor X7c 4G’s camera details are also limited. Given the price point, image processing will be crucial. Samsung’s image processing typically leans towards vibrant, saturated colors, while Honor’s tends to be more natural. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing gimmick and should be disregarded by serious photographers. Focusing on the main sensor’s capabilities and image processing is key.
Performance
Under the hood, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G features the MediaTek Helio G99, built on a 6nm process, with a CPU configuration of 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Honor X7c 4G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, also on a 6nm process, but with a different core arrangement: 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53. While clock speeds aren’t everything, the Helio G99’s Cortex-A76 cores offer a performance edge over the X7c’s Cortex-A73 cores, resulting in snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The A24 is likely to handle graphically intensive games with slightly higher frame rates. Both devices likely feature similar RAM configurations, but the A24’s processor architecture provides a clear advantage.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A24 4G boasts an endurance rating of 141 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the exact battery capacity isn’t specified, this rating suggests efficient power management. The Honor X7c 4G compensates with a faster 35W wired charging solution, compared to the A24’s 25W. This means the X7c can replenish its battery significantly quicker, potentially going from 0-100% in under an hour. However, the A24’s superior endurance means you may not need to charge it as frequently, mitigating the charging speed difference. The A24’s efficiency offsets the charging speed advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X7c 4G if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds in this price bracket and frequently find yourself needing to top up quickly. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G if you prioritize a brighter, more enjoyable viewing experience, slightly better overall performance for everyday tasks, and a more refined software experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Helio G99 in the Galaxy A24 4G get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Helio G99 is a relatively efficient chip, and while it will generate heat during prolonged gaming, it's unlikely to experience severe throttling. The 6nm process helps with thermal management, and Samsung’s software likely includes thermal throttling mechanisms to prevent overheating. Expect some warmth, but not to the point of significant performance degradation.
❓ Is the 35W charging on the Honor X7c 4G a game-changer, or is the 25W on the A24 sufficient?
While 35W is faster, the Galaxy A24’s excellent battery endurance means you won’t need to charge it as often. The A24’s 25W charging is still reasonably quick, and the convenience of longer battery life often outweighs the benefit of slightly faster charging speeds. The X7c’s charging is beneficial for those who frequently need a quick top-up.
❓ How does Samsung's One UI affect the performance of the Galaxy A24 4G?
Samsung's One UI is feature-rich but can be resource intensive. While the Helio G99 is capable, One UI's animations and background processes can sometimes lead to slightly slower performance compared to a more streamlined Android experience. However, Samsung has been optimizing One UI in recent versions, and the A24's processor should handle it adequately for most users.
