The Honor X7c 4G and Oppo A78 4G represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both devices leverage Qualcomm's Snapdragon 6-series platform, but subtle differences in chipset and charging technology create distinct user experiences. This comparison dissects these nuances to determine which phone delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid replenishment, the Oppo A78 4G emerges as the winner. Its 67W charging capability significantly reduces downtime compared to the Honor X7c's 35W charging, despite the latter having a slightly newer CPU architecture. While performance is similar, the charging advantage is substantial.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 18 | 2023, July 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 18 | Available. Released 2023, July 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 166.9 x 76.8 x 8.1 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) | 160 x 73.2 x 7.9 mm (6.30 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g or 196 g (6.84 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1610 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~261 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired | 67W wired, PD, 76% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5200/6000 mAh (market/region dependent) | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Forest Green, Moonlight White | Mist Black, Aqua Green |
| Models | ALT-LX2 | CPH2565 |
| Price | - | About 200 EUR |
Honor X7c 4G
- Slightly newer CPU architecture (Snapdragon 685)
- Potentially better CPU performance in benchmarks
- Competitive price point
- Slower 35W charging
- Limited information on camera specifications
- Likely longer charging times
Oppo A78 4G
- Significantly faster 67W charging with PD
- Quick 30-minute charge to 76%
- Convenient for users needing frequent top-ups
- Older CPU architecture (Snapdragon 680)
- Potentially slightly lower CPU performance
- Camera quality dependent on image processing
Display Comparison
Neither Honor nor Oppo provide display specifications beyond resolution in their marketing materials. Assuming both utilize standard IPS LCD panels common in this price bracket, color accuracy and viewing angles will likely be comparable. The absence of high refresh rates or advanced features like LTPO suggests a focus on cost optimization. Bezels are expected to be moderate, typical for the segment.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are lacking for both devices. Given the price point, expect a primary sensor around 50MP, likely paired with auxiliary lenses of limited utility (e.g., 2MP macro or depth sensors). Image processing will be a key differentiator, with Oppo historically favoring more vibrant, saturated images, while Honor tends towards a more natural look. Without detailed sensor size and aperture information, a definitive camera comparison is impossible. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is expected on both models.
Performance
Both the Honor X7c and Oppo A78 are powered by Qualcomm's Snapdragon 6-series, but with key distinctions. The Honor X7c features the Snapdragon 685 (6nm), utilizing 4x 2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The Oppo A78 employs the Snapdragon 680 (6nm) with 4x 2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold cores and 4x 1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver cores. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon 685's Cortex-A73 cores offer a higher peak clock speed, potentially translating to slightly snappier performance in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the real-world difference will be minimal for everyday use. Both phones will likely perform similarly in gaming, constrained by the Adreno 610 GPU present in both chipsets. The 6nm process node ensures reasonable thermal efficiency, but sustained heavy workloads may still lead to some throttling.
Battery Life
The Oppo A78 4G’s standout feature is its 67W wired charging, supported by Power Delivery (PD) and claiming a 76% charge in just 30 minutes. This is a significant advantage over the Honor X7c’s 35W charging. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity difference. The Oppo A78’s charging speed caters to users who need quick top-ups, while the Honor X7c requires a longer charging cycle.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X7c 4G if you prioritize a slightly newer CPU architecture and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. This phone suits users who primarily use their device for basic tasks and don't mind overnight charging. Buy the Oppo A78 4G if you value fast charging above all else. This is the ideal choice for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day and appreciate the convenience of a near-full charge in under an hour.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 680 in the Oppo A78 struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 680, paired with the Adreno 610 GPU, can handle PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to medium or low for a smooth experience. Expect occasional frame drops during intense firefights. The Honor X7c with the 685 will offer a similar gaming experience.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to fully charge the Oppo A78 4G from 0%?
Oppo claims 76% in 30 minutes. Based on this, a full 0-100% charge should take approximately 45-55 minutes, making it significantly faster than the Honor X7c, which will likely take over 1.5 - 2 hours with its 35W charging.
❓ Is the camera on either phone good enough for casual social media posting?
Yes, both phones should be adequate for casual social media photography in good lighting conditions. However, don't expect exceptional low-light performance or detailed images. The quality will heavily depend on the image processing algorithms employed by each brand.
