The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor X7b and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro represent compelling options at different price points. The X7b focuses on providing a solid, reliable experience, while the X6 Pro aims for near-flagship performance with its more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset delivers significantly faster processing and gaming capabilities. However, the Honor X7b remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget who prioritize battery life and a stable, everyday experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 01 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, December 01 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 166.7 x 76.5 x 8.2 mm (6.56 x 3.01 x 0.32 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~389 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.3 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 850 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (CLK-LX1 only) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Po 5330 mAh (Europe and LATAM)· Li-Po 6000 mAh (ROW) | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Flowing Silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | CLK-LX1, CLK-LX2, CLK-LX3 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Honor X7b
- More affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life (depending on capacity)
- Reliable and stable software experience
- Significantly weaker performance
- Less capable camera system
- Slower charging speeds
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Exceptional performance with Dimensity 8300 Ultra
- Bright and vibrant display
- Fast 67W charging
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more heat generation under heavy load
- Software experience may include more bloatware
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the Honor X7b (brightness data unavailable, assumed to be lower based on chipset and price). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the X6 Pro’s higher brightness and potentially better color calibration (based on Xiaomi’s display track record) provide a superior viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests neither will offer adaptive refresh rates for optimal power efficiency, but the X6 Pro’s brightness advantage is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
While both phones feature camera systems, the Poco X6 Pro is expected to offer a more versatile and capable experience. Although specific sensor details are missing for the X7b, the X6 Pro’s camera benefits from the processing power of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra, enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The X6 Pro’s camera is capable of both high-quality photo and video capture, while the X7b is likely to focus on providing acceptable results in good lighting conditions. We anticipate the X6 Pro will have more advanced features like improved HDR and potentially 4K video recording.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is in a different league than the Honor X7b’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm). The Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s octa-core configuration, featuring a high-clocked Cortex-A715 prime core, delivers significantly faster CPU and GPU performance. This translates to smoother multitasking, quicker app loading times, and a far more enjoyable gaming experience. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity chip also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The Snapdragon 680 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery performance with an active use score of 11:46h. While the Honor X7b’s battery capacity is unknown, the X6 Pro’s efficient Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset and optimized software contribute to its impressive endurance. Furthermore, the X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging, supporting QC2.0 and PD3.0, allows for a full charge in just 45 minutes, significantly faster than the X7b’s 35W charging. This faster charging is a major convenience factor for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X7b if you need a dependable daily driver with a focus on longevity and aren't demanding of intensive tasks like high-end gaming. It's ideal for users who prioritize battery life and a predictable user experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prefer a phone capable of handling demanding games, multitasking, and future software updates with ease. It's the better choice for power users and mobile gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Poco X6 Pro's Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset get hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 8300 Ultra is a powerful chip, the 4nm process helps mitigate heat. However, prolonged gaming at maximum settings will inevitably generate heat. The Poco X6 Pro likely incorporates thermal management solutions, but some throttling may occur to maintain stable performance. It's still significantly cooler than older generation chips.
❓ Is the 35W charging on the Honor X7b slow compared to the Poco X6 Pro's 67W?
Yes, 35W is considerably slower than 67W. The Poco X6 Pro can fully charge in approximately 45 minutes, while the Honor X7b will take significantly longer. This difference is noticeable for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 680 in the Honor X7b handle multitasking compared to the Dimensity 8300 Ultra?
The Snapdragon 680 will struggle with heavy multitasking. While it can handle a few apps simultaneously, switching between them or running demanding applications in the background will result in noticeable lag. The Dimensity 8300 Ultra, with its superior processing power and RAM management, offers a much smoother and more responsive multitasking experience.
