The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor X7b 5G and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro represent compelling options at different price points. The X7b focuses on delivering 5G connectivity and a solid user experience at an accessible price, while the Poco X6 Pro aims for near-flagship performance with its more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset, coupled with 67W fast charging, delivers a noticeably smoother and faster experience. While the Honor X7b 5G offers good value, the Poco X6 Pro’s performance advantage justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 04 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 166.7 x 76.5 x 8.2 mm (6.56 x 3.01 x 0.32 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~389 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.3 cm2 (~87.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 850 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.2 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Crystal Silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | - | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 150 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Honor X7b 5G
- More affordable price point
- Reliable 5G connectivity
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Significantly weaker chipset compared to Poco X6 Pro
- Slower charging speed (35W)
- Likely inferior display brightness
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- 67W fast charging with QC/PD support
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Higher price compared to Honor X7b 5G
- Potentially higher power consumption
- May require more frequent software updates
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the Honor X7b 5G, which lacks specific brightness data but is likely lower given its price point. While both likely utilize LCD panels (based on market segment), the higher brightness of the Poco X6 Pro is a clear advantage for media consumption and general usability. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests standard refresh rate management, impacting power consumption during dynamic content.
Camera Comparison
The context data provides limited camera details. However, given the Poco X6 Pro’s positioning, it likely features a more capable primary camera sensor and image processing pipeline. The Honor X7b 5G will likely focus on providing adequate image quality for social media sharing, but will likely fall short in low-light conditions and dynamic range. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests a reliance on software stabilization, which is less effective. We can assume the Poco X6 Pro will offer more versatile video recording capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Honor X7b 5G’s Dimensity 6020 (7nm). The 8300 Ultra’s CPU configuration – 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – offers significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance than the X7b’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The 4nm process node of the 8300 Ultra also provides better thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. While RAM specifications are not provided, the Poco X6 Pro is likely to benefit from faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery performance, achieving 11:46h of active use. While the Honor X7b 5G’s battery capacity is unknown, the Poco X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging (with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support, reaching 100% in 45 minutes) significantly outperforms the X7b’s 35W charging. This faster charging speed minimizes downtime and provides a more convenient user experience. The combination of efficient chipset and fast charging makes the Poco X6 Pro the clear winner in this category.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X7b 5G if you prioritize affordability and reliable 5G connectivity for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. It’s ideal for users who don’t demand peak performance. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you’re a power user who values gaming, multitasking, and fast charging. Its superior chipset and faster charging make it the better choice for demanding applications and those who want a phone that can keep up with their fast-paced lifestyle.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8300 Ultra in the Poco X6 Pro get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8300 Ultra is built on a 4nm process, which inherently offers better thermal efficiency than the 7nm Dimensity 6020 in the Honor X7b 5G. While some heat generation is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the Poco X6 Pro is designed to manage temperatures effectively, minimizing throttling and maintaining consistent performance. However, sustained peak performance will still generate some heat.
❓ Is the 35W charging on the Honor X7b 5G slow compared to the Poco X6 Pro's 67W?
Yes, 35W charging is considerably slower than 67W. The Poco X6 Pro can fully charge in approximately 45 minutes, while the Honor X7b 5G will take significantly longer. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Will the Poco X6 Pro run demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
The Poco X6 Pro, with its Dimensity 8300 Ultra, is well-equipped to run Genshin Impact at high settings. Expect smooth frame rates and a visually appealing experience. However, achieving consistently high frame rates may require adjusting graphics settings based on your preferences.
