The Honor X7 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The X7 prioritizes efficiency with a Snapdragon chipset, while the 11R opts for a Mediatek Dimensity processor focused on delivering more raw power. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and occasional gaming, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R is the better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700, built on a 7nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Honor X7’s Snapdragon 680. However, the Honor X7 offers a slightly more efficient chipset for extended battery life during lighter tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 30 | 2022, September 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 14 | Available. Released 2022, September 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.6 x 77.2 x 8.6 mm (6.60 x 3.04 x 0.34 in) | 164 x 76.1 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Titanium Silver | Black, Blue, Gray |
| Models | CMA-LX2, CMA-LX1, CMA-LX3 | 22095RA98C |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 160 EUR |
Honor X7
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset for longer battery life.
- Faster 22.5W wired charging.
- Potentially better software optimization for power saving.
- Less powerful CPU compared to the Dimensity 700.
- May struggle with demanding games and multitasking.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset for smoother performance.
- Better CPU architecture for multitasking and gaming.
- Potentially improved image processing capabilities.
- Less power-efficient chipset, potentially leading to shorter battery life.
- Slower 18W wired charging.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to feature LCD panels, common in this price bracket. While specific details like peak brightness and color accuracy are unavailable, the focus here is on the internal hardware. The display quality will likely be similar, with the user experience dictated more by software optimization than panel specifications.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones will feature a primary camera alongside supporting lenses (likely depth and macro). The image processing capabilities of the respective chipsets will play a crucial role. Mediatek’s Dimensity series often includes advanced image signal processors (ISPs), potentially giving the Redmi Note 11R an edge in image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) utilizes two Cortex-A76 performance cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, paired with six Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. This configuration provides a significant uplift in CPU performance compared to the Honor X7’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm). The Snapdragon 680 employs a more balanced octa-core setup with four Kryo 265 Gold cores at 2.4 GHz and four Kryo 265 Silver cores at 1.9 GHz. While the Snapdragon 680 benefits from a slightly smaller node size (6nm vs 7nm), the Dimensity 700’s core architecture delivers superior processing power. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Redmi Note 11R.
Battery Life
The Honor X7’s Snapdragon 680 is known for its power efficiency. While the Redmi Note 11R’s Dimensity 700 consumes more power, its 18W charging compensates somewhat. The Honor X7’s 22.5W charging offers a faster top-up, but the difference in charging speed is unlikely to be dramatic. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but the X7 is likely to last longer during light to moderate use due to its more efficient chipset.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X7 if you prioritize all-day battery life and primarily use your phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and social media. Its Snapdragon 680 is optimized for efficiency. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11R if you want a more responsive experience for multitasking, streaming, and light gaming. The Dimensity 700 offers a performance boost, making it ideal for users who demand more from their phone.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi Note 11R’s Dimensity 700 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Dimensity 700 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. It’s not a gaming powerhouse, but it offers a playable experience, unlike the Snapdragon 680 which may struggle with higher settings.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between 18W and 22.5W?
While 22.5W is faster, the difference in real-world charging time isn’t massive. Expect the Honor X7 to charge slightly quicker, but both phones will still take over an hour to fully charge from 0%.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 680 in the Honor X7 get hot during prolonged use?
The Snapdragon 680 is known for its thermal efficiency. It’s unlikely to overheat significantly during normal use, even with extended video playback or social media browsing. However, it may throttle performance under sustained heavy load.
❓ Is the 7nm process of the Dimensity 700 a significant advantage over the 6nm process of the Snapdragon 680?
While a smaller process node generally indicates better efficiency, the architectural differences between the chipsets are more impactful. The Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 cores provide a substantial performance boost that outweighs the slight efficiency advantage of the Snapdragon 680’s 6nm process.
