The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor X7 and Samsung Galaxy A23 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at an affordable price, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A23 edges out the Honor X7 thanks to its slightly faster charging, potentially better camera software, and the Samsung brand reputation. However, the Honor X7 offers a very competitive package, especially if design and screen size are priorities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 30 | 2022, March 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 14 | Available. Released 2022, March 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.6 x 77.2 x 8.6 mm (6.60 x 3.04 x 0.34 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Titanium Silver | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | CMA-LX2, CMA-LX1, CMA-LX3 | SM-A235F, SM-A235F/DS, SM-A235F/DSN, SM-A235M, SM-A235M/DS, SM-A235N |
| Price | About 90 EUR | £ 99.00 / ₹ 14,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.48 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.36 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 130h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1241:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 273554 (v9)
GeekBench: 1632 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor X7
- Large Display
- Stylish Design
- Competitive Price
- Decent Performance
- Potentially Lower Brightness
- Uncertain Camera Quality
- Slower Charging (potentially)
Samsung Galaxy A23
- Excellent Battery Life
- Samsung Brand Reputation
- Potentially Better Camera
- Slightly Faster Charging
- Design may be less striking
- Price slightly higher than X7
- Performance similar to X7
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a large 6.7-inch display, but the Galaxy A23 boasts a slightly higher measured brightness of 464 nits compared to the X7's likely lower figure (spec not provided). The contrast ratio is excellent on both, at 1241:1, promising vibrant colors and deep blacks. The A23's display might offer a marginally better viewing experience in bright sunlight.
Camera Comparison
While both phones have 'Photo / Video' listed, the Galaxy A23 is expected to have a more versatile camera system with potentially better image processing thanks to Samsung's established camera software. The X7 likely focuses on larger megapixel counts, but image quality often depends more on software than hardware alone. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are needed for a more accurate comparison.
Performance
Both devices share the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset and Octa-core CPU. Real-world performance will likely be similar for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. However, Samsung's software optimization might provide a slightly smoother experience.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A23 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 130 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Honor X7's battery capacity is likely comparable, but the A23's optimization could contribute to its superior endurance. Both phones support 22.5W/25W wired charging, with the A23 having a slight edge.
Buying Guide
The Honor X7 is ideal for users prioritizing a large display and a stylish design on a tight budget. The Samsung Galaxy A23 is a better choice for those who value a reliable brand, potentially better camera performance, and slightly faster charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Samsung Galaxy A23 is expected to have better battery life due to its endurance rating of 130 hours.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 680 chipset good for gaming?
The Snapdragon 680 is suitable for casual gaming and everyday tasks, but it's not a high-performance chipset for demanding games.