The Honor X7 and Oppo A57s represent compelling options in the crowded sub-$200 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in their chipsets and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing efficiency and sustained performance, the Honor X7 is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 680, built on a 6nm process, offers a noticeable advantage over the Oppo A57s’ 12nm Helio G35, translating to better battery life and smoother multitasking. However, the Oppo A57s’ faster 33W charging is a significant benefit for those who value quick top-ups.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 30 | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 14 | Available. Released 2022, September 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Panda Glass), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.6 x 77.2 x 8.6 mm (6.60 x 3.04 x 0.34 in) | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| | - | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 69 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Titanium Silver | Starry Black, Sky Blue |
| Models | CMA-LX2, CMA-LX1, CMA-LX3 | CPH2385 |
| Price | About 90 EUR | - |
Honor X7
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 processor
- Better sustained performance for multitasking
- Potentially longer battery life due to 6nm process
- Slower 22.5W charging
- Likely similar display quality to Oppo A57s
Oppo A57s
- Faster 33W charging (100% in 69 minutes)
- Competitive price point
- Adequate for basic smartphone tasks
- Less efficient Helio G35 processor
- Potential for thermal throttling under load
- Shorter battery life compared to Honor X7
Display Comparison
Neither Honor nor Oppo provide display specifications beyond the basic panel type. Assuming both utilize standard IPS LCDs, the display experience will likely be similar in terms of color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of high refresh rates or advanced features like LTPO on either device suggests a focus on cost reduction. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this price segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature a primary camera and potentially depth/macro sensors. The image processing capabilities will likely be similar, focusing on basic scene optimization. The larger sensor (if present on the X7) would capture more light, resulting in better low-light performance. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization, which is less effective. The 2MP macro cameras commonly found on phones in this price range offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor X7’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture and a smaller fabrication process compared to the Oppo A57s’ MediaTek Helio G35 (12nm). This 6nm process is crucial; it allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency. The Snapdragon 680’s octa-core configuration (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) is also architecturally superior to the Helio G35’s (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53), offering better single-core and multi-core performance. While both have octa-core CPUs, the Cortex-A53 cores in the Helio G35 are older and less efficient. This translates to the X7 handling multitasking and demanding apps with greater ease and less thermal throttling.
Battery Life
The Oppo A57s takes a clear lead in charging speed with its 33W wired charging, promising a full charge in 69 minutes. The Honor X7’s 22.5W charging is significantly slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 680’s superior efficiency means the X7 will likely offer comparable or even better real-world battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery. The faster charging of the A57s is ideal for users who frequently need to top up their phone quickly, while the X7 prioritizes longevity between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X7 if you need a phone that balances performance and battery life for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. Its more efficient processor will provide a smoother experience over the long haul. Buy the Oppo A57s if you prioritize fast charging above all else and primarily use your phone for basic communication and media consumption, accepting some performance trade-offs.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G35 in the Oppo A57s struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio G35 is an entry-level chipset. While it can run PUBG Mobile, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a playable frame rate. Expect some stuttering and potential overheating during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 680 in the Honor X7 will provide a smoother, more consistent gaming experience, even at medium settings.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Oppo A57s compared to the 22.5W on the Honor X7 in real-world use?
The Oppo A57s' 33W charging can add a significant amount of charge in a short period. While the exact difference depends on the battery capacity, you can expect a roughly 30-40% faster charging time from 0-100% with the A57s. This is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 680 in the Honor X7 offer 5G connectivity?
No, the Snapdragon 680 is a 4G-only chipset. Both the Honor X7 and Oppo A57s are limited to 4G LTE connectivity. If 5G is a priority, you'll need to consider phones in a higher price bracket.
❓ Is the difference in processor performance between the two phones noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks, the difference might not be immediately apparent. However, the Snapdragon 680's superior efficiency will result in smoother scrolling, faster app loading times, and less lag when switching between applications, even during prolonged use. The Helio G35 may exhibit occasional slowdowns with multiple apps open.
