The Honor X7 and Motorola Moto G52 occupy a fiercely competitive segment: the sub-$200 smartphone market. Both devices leverage the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 chipset, promising efficient performance. However, subtle differences in charging speed and potentially other areas can significantly impact the user experience. This comparison dissects these nuances to determine which phone delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience, the Motorola Moto G52 emerges as the better choice. While both phones share the same Snapdragon 680 processor, the G52’s 30W charging significantly reduces downtime, making it ideal for those constantly on the go. The Honor X7 remains a viable option, but the charging difference is a key differentiator.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 30 | 2022, April 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 14 | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 167.6 x 77.2 x 8.6 mm (6.60 x 3.04 x 0.34 in) | 160.1 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Titanium Silver | Charcoal Gray, Porcelain White |
| Models | CMA-LX2, CMA-LX1, CMA-LX3 | XT2221-1, XT2221-2 |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 470 EUR |
Honor X7
- Potentially lower initial price
- Efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Likely large battery capacity (estimated 5000mAh)
- Slower 22.5W charging
- Display specs are unknown
- Camera performance relies heavily on software optimization
Motorola Moto G52
- Faster 30W wired charging
- Efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Likely large battery capacity (estimated 5000mAh)
- May be slightly more expensive
- Display specs are unknown
- Camera performance relies heavily on software optimization
Display Comparison
Both the Honor X7 and Motorola Moto G52 likely feature LCD panels, common in this price bracket. Without specific display specs like resolution or peak brightness, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, the Moto G52’s potential for a slightly higher peak brightness (based on Motorola’s typical display calibration) could offer better outdoor visibility. The absence of high refresh rate panels on either device suggests a focus on power efficiency rather than fluid scrolling.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a direct comparison is challenging. Both phones likely employ a multi-camera setup, but the quality will depend on the primary sensor’s size and aperture. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS). Image processing algorithms will play a crucial role in determining the final image quality, and Motorola often leans towards more saturated colors, while Honor tends to aim for more natural tones.
Performance
The core of both phones is the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver cores. This means performance will be virtually identical for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. The 6nm process node contributes to good power efficiency, minimizing heat and maximizing battery life. RAM configurations are not specified, but the performance will be heavily influenced by the amount of RAM and its speed (LPDDR4X is likely).
Battery Life
The battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but both will likely fall in the 5000mAh range, typical for this price point. However, the Motorola Moto G52’s 30W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Honor X7’s 22.5W charging. This translates to a noticeably faster 0-100% charge time, potentially shaving off 30-60 minutes. For users who frequently need to top up their battery, the G52’s faster charging is a compelling benefit.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X7 if you prioritize a potentially lower initial cost and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid choice for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks and charge overnight. Buy the Motorola Moto G52 if you value faster charging and need to quickly top up your battery throughout the day. This phone is better suited for users who are frequently away from a power source and need a reliable, quickly-charging device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 680 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 680 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a smooth frame rate. Don't expect a flagship gaming experience, but it's perfectly adequate for casual gaming.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G52 with the 30W charger?
While a precise time isn't available, the Moto G52’s 30W charging should fully charge the battery (likely around 5000mAh) in approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes to 2 hours, depending on usage during charging. This is significantly faster than the Honor X7’s 22.5W charging.
❓ Are either of these phones 5G compatible?
No, both the Honor X7 and Motorola Moto G52 utilize the Snapdragon 680 4G chipset, meaning they are limited to 4G LTE connectivity. 5G support is not available on either device.
