Google Pixel 7a vs. Honor X6c: A Detailed Comparison of Performance, Camera, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice, offering a significantly better camera experience and smoother performance thanks to the Tensor G2 chipset. However, the Honor X6c provides exceptional value for budget-conscious buyers who prioritize battery life and basic functionality over advanced features.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor X6c | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - LATAM | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 06 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 06 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.6 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.61 inches, 105.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz, 1010 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra (12 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15, Magic OS 9 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (NIC-LX1, NIC-LX2 only) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 35W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5300 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Ocean Cyan, Moonlight White | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | NIC-LX1, NIC-LX2, NIC-LX3 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Honor X6c
- Superior camera quality and image processing
- Faster and more responsive performance with Tensor G2
- Brighter and smoother display
- Access to Google’s AI features
- Higher price point
- Slower wired charging than Honor X6c
Google Pixel 7a
- Significantly lower price
- Faster 35W wired charging
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficient chipset
- Reliable for basic smartphone tasks
- Inferior camera performance
- Slower processor and less responsive performance
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1070 nits, compared to an assumed lower brightness on the Honor X6c (typical of its price bracket). This translates to better visibility outdoors. While the X6c’s panel specifications are not provided, the Pixel 7a’s OLED panel offers superior contrast and color accuracy. The Pixel 7a’s 90Hz refresh rate (not specified for the X6c) also contributes to a smoother user experience, particularly when scrolling through content.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is its standout feature. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a excels in low-light conditions and offers features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur. The Honor X6c’s camera capabilities are likely more basic, focusing on providing acceptable images in good lighting conditions. The absence of details regarding OIS or advanced features suggests a simpler camera experience. We can assume the X6c will have a lower quality video recording capability.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, fabricated on a 5nm process, delivers substantially more processing power than the Honor X6c’s Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra (12nm). The Tensor G2’s CPU configuration – 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 – is architecturally superior to the Helio G81’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55. This means faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience on the Pixel 7a. The 5nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The X6c will handle basic tasks adequately, but will struggle with demanding games or applications.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating good battery life, but the Honor X6c likely offers longer screen-on time due to its less power-hungry chipset and display. The Pixel 7a supports 18W wired charging with PD3.0 and 7.5W wireless charging, offering convenience. The Honor X6c’s 35W wired charging is significantly faster, allowing for quicker top-ups, potentially offsetting the Pixel 7a’s slightly better overall endurance. The faster charging is a key advantage for users who prioritize quick power boosts.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X6c if you need a reliable, long-lasting phone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and social media, and you're on a very tight budget. It's ideal for users who don't prioritize gaming or high-end photography. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value a top-tier camera, smooth performance for demanding apps, and access to Google’s AI-powered features, even if it means spending more and potentially sacrificing some battery endurance.