The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor X60 Pro and Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro represent compelling options for users seeking flagship-level features without the flagship price tag. This comparison dives deep into their specifications, performance, and features to determine which device offers the best overall experience, focusing on the core differences between Qualcomm’s 6-series and 8+ series chipsets.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset delivers significantly superior performance, making it ideal for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. While the Honor X60 Pro offers respectable efficiency, the Poco F5 Pro’s power advantage is hard to ignore.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 16 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 25 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~437 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3000 (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 14, Magic OS 8 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (ultrasound), compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6600 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Silver, Orange | Black, White |
| Models | BRP-AN00 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor X60 Pro
- Efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset
- Competitive 66W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Significantly less powerful than the Poco F5 Pro
- Display likely lacks the brightness of the Poco F5 Pro
- Limited camera details suggest a less advanced system
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Brighter display with 1059 nits peak brightness
- Faster charging with wired and wireless options
- Potentially higher price
- More powerful chipset may lead to slightly higher temperatures under sustained load
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1059 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Honor X60 Pro. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays likely utilize AMOLED technology (implied by the 'infinite' contrast ratio on the Poco F5 Pro), the Poco’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. The absence of refresh rate information for the X60 Pro suggests it may not match the smoothness offered by potentially higher refresh rates on the Poco F5 Pro.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are missing. However, given the Poco F5 Pro’s positioning as a performance-focused device, it’s reasonable to expect a more sophisticated camera system with a larger sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The Honor X60 Pro likely focuses on providing adequate camera performance for social media and casual photography. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the Poco F5 Pro’s overall hardware suggests a superior imaging experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Honor X60 Pro’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm). The 8+ Gen 1 features a prime Cortex-X2 core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A710 cores at 2.5 GHz, providing a significant performance boost in CPU-intensive tasks. The X60 Pro’s Cortex-A78 cores, while capable, are less efficient and offer lower peak performance. This difference is particularly noticeable in gaming and demanding applications. The 4nm process node in both chips contributes to improved thermal efficiency, but the 8+ Gen 1’s more advanced architecture still allows for sustained higher performance.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite the Poco F5 Pro’s more powerful chipset. This suggests efficient power management on both sides. However, the Poco F5 Pro offers significantly faster charging options: 67W wired (50% in 15 minutes), 30W wireless (50% in 32 minutes), and support for PD3.0 and QC3+. The Honor X60 Pro’s 66W wired charging is competitive, but lacks wireless charging and the advanced charging protocols of the Poco. The 5W reverse wired charging on the X60 Pro is a niche feature, while the Poco doesn't mention it.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X60 Pro if you prioritize efficient power consumption and a balanced experience for everyday tasks, and are on a tighter budget. Its 66W charging is sufficient for most users. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you demand maximum performance for gaming, content creation, or multitasking, and value faster charging speeds (including wireless) and a brighter display.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro overheat during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a powerful chip, its 4nm process and Xiaomi’s thermal management solutions should prevent significant overheating. However, some throttling is possible during prolonged, demanding gaming. The Poco F5 Pro is expected to maintain high frame rates for extended periods, but may not sustain peak performance indefinitely.
❓ Does the Honor X60 Pro support popular gaming titles like PUBG Mobile at high frame rates?
The Honor X60 Pro’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. Achieving 60fps consistently at high settings may be challenging. The Poco F5 Pro, with its superior chipset, will offer a significantly smoother and more visually rich gaming experience.
❓ Is the 30W wireless charging on the Poco F5 Pro significantly faster than wired charging for topping up the battery?
While 30W wireless charging is convenient, the 67W wired charging on the Poco F5 Pro is considerably faster. The 67W wired charging can reach 50% in just 15 minutes, while the 30W wireless charging takes 32 minutes for the same result. Wired charging remains the fastest option for quickly replenishing the battery.
