Honor X60 Pro vs Google Pixel 7a: Which Mid-Range Champion Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 7a is the clear winner. Its Tensor G2 chip, coupled with Google’s image processing, consistently delivers superior photos and videos. However, the Honor X60 Pro offers significantly faster charging and a potentially smoother experience for less demanding tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor X60 Pro | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 16 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 25 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Tempered glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~437 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3000 (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14, Magic OS 8 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (ultrasound), compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6600 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Silver, Orange | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | BRP-AN00 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Honor X60 Pro
- 66W Fast Charging: Significantly faster than the Pixel 7a.
- 5W Reverse Wired Charging: Convenient for topping up accessories.
- Potentially Lower Price: Likely more affordable than the Pixel 7a.
- Less Powerful Chipset: Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 lags behind the Tensor G2.
- Inferior Camera System: Likely lacks the computational photography capabilities of the Pixel 7a.
Google Pixel 7a
- Superior Camera: Google’s computational photography is a major advantage.
- Powerful Chipset: Tensor G2 offers better performance and AI capabilities.
- Clean Software Experience: Regular updates and a bloatware-free Android experience.
- Slower Charging: 18W charging is considerably slower than the X60 Pro’s 66W.
- Higher Price: Typically more expensive than the Honor X60 Pro.
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1070 nits, which translates to better visibility under direct sunlight compared to the Honor X60 Pro (brightness data unavailable). While the X60 Pro’s panel specifics are unknown, the Pixel 7a’s OLED panel offers vibrant colors and excellent contrast. The Pixel 7a’s 90Hz refresh rate (assumed, based on Pixel A-series history) would provide a smoother scrolling experience than a standard 60Hz panel, if the X60 Pro doesn’t feature a higher refresh rate. Bezels are likely comparable, given both phones target a similar price bracket.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is its standout feature. While specific sensor details are unavailable for the X60 Pro, the Pixel 7a leverages Google’s computational photography expertise to deliver exceptional image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Tensor G2’s image signal processor (ISP) enables features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur, enhancing photos post-capture. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also superior, offering excellent stabilization and dynamic range. The X60 Pro likely relies more on hardware specifications, and without knowing those, it’s difficult to compete with Google’s software prowess.
Performance
The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 (5nm) significantly outperforms the Honor X60 Pro’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) in CPU-intensive tasks. The Tensor G2’s prime core, clocked at 2.85 GHz (Cortex-X1), provides a substantial performance boost over the X60 Pro’s 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. While both utilize Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the Tensor G2’s more advanced architecture and 5nm process node offer superior sustained performance and thermal management. The X60 Pro will handle everyday tasks well, but the Pixel 7a is the better choice for demanding games and multitasking. The Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 also excels in AI-related tasks, such as image processing and voice recognition.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a boasts an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the Honor X60 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the Pixel 7a’s efficiency and software optimization contribute to its longevity. However, the X60 Pro compensates with its significantly faster 66W wired charging, allowing for a full charge in under an hour, compared to the Pixel 7a’s 18W charging. The X60 Pro also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Pixel 7a, enabling it to charge accessories on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X60 Pro if you need blazing-fast 66W charging and prioritize a smooth experience for everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and video streaming. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and aren’t heavily invested in mobile gaming or professional photography. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prefer a best-in-class camera system, a clean and regularly updated Android experience, and benefit from Google’s AI-powered features, even if it means slower charging and a slightly less powerful chipset for raw performance.