The Honor X60 GT and OnePlus Ace 2V represent compelling options in the mid-to-high range, both prioritizing performance and fast charging. The X60 GT leverages the proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Ace 2V opts for MediaTek’s Dimensity 9000. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device delivers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Ace 2V emerges as the slightly better choice. While both offer 80W charging, the Ace 2V achieves a full charge in 32 minutes compared to the X60 GT’s 47% in 15 minutes, suggesting more efficient power delivery and potentially better battery health long-term. The Dimensity 9000 also offers a slight edge in sustained performance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 22 | 2023, March 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 22 | Available. Released 2023, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 161 x 74.2 x 7.7 mm (6.34 x 2.92 x 0.30 in) | 162.6 x 75.1 x 8.2 mm (6.40 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 191.5 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Asahi Glass |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2664 pixels (~436 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.5 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 5000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 47% in 15 min
5W reverse wired | 80W wired, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6300 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silver, Blue, Black | Black, Blue/Green |
| Models | AGI-AN00 | PHP110 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 310 EUR |
Honor X60 GT
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- 80W fast charging capability
- Potentially lower price point (depending on region)
- Slower full charge time (32 minutes to 100%)
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
OnePlus Ace 2V
- Dimensity 9000 offers excellent performance and efficiency
- Faster full charge time (32 minutes)
- Potentially better thermal management
- MediaTek chipsets sometimes face software optimization challenges
- Price may be slightly higher than the Honor X60 GT
Display Comparison
Context data lacks display specifics, but given the price bracket, both likely feature AMOLED panels with high refresh rates. The key differentiator will be peak brightness and color calibration. OnePlus typically excels in display quality, potentially offering a wider color gamut and higher peak brightness. However, without concrete data, this remains speculative. PWM dimming rates would also be crucial for sensitive users, a spec not provided.
Camera Comparison
Without camera specs, a direct comparison is impossible. However, both brands generally prioritize main sensor quality. We can assume both phones will feature multi-camera systems, but the image processing algorithms will differ. OnePlus tends towards more natural-looking images, while Honor often boosts saturation. The absence of information regarding sensor size and OIS is a significant omission.
Performance
The core battle lies between the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (X60 GT) and the MediaTek Dimensity 9000 (Ace 2V). Both are 4nm chips, but the Dimensity 9000 boasts a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed (3.05 GHz vs 3.2 GHz on the Snapdragon), though the Cortex-X2 core architecture is identical. The Dimensity 9000’s CPU cluster is clocked slightly higher across the A710 cores (2.85 GHz vs 2.75 GHz), potentially leading to a small performance advantage in multi-threaded tasks. More importantly, the Dimensity 9000 is known for its superior thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while powerful, can run hot under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 80W wired charging, but the implementation differs significantly. The Honor X60 GT reaches 47% charge in 15 minutes, while the OnePlus Ace 2V achieves a full 100% charge in 32 minutes. This suggests the Ace 2V’s charging system is more efficient, delivering a more consistent power flow. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster full charge time of the Ace 2V is a clear advantage for users who prefer to quickly top up their phones.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X60 GT if you prioritize a proven chipset with a strong track record and are comfortable with a potentially slower full charge time. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their battery throughout the day. Buy the OnePlus Ace 2V if you value faster full charge times, potentially better sustained performance under load, and a more modern chipset architecture, making it a better fit for power users and gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Honor X60 GT throttle during extended gaming sessions like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a powerful chip, but it's known to generate heat under sustained load. While the Honor X60 GT likely has thermal management features, expect some performance throttling after 30-60 minutes of demanding gaming. The OnePlus Ace 2V’s Dimensity 9000 generally handles heat more effectively.
❓ How does the 80W charging on the OnePlus Ace 2V compare to other 80W charging implementations?
The Ace 2V’s 80W charging is notably efficient, achieving a full charge in just 32 minutes. This suggests a sophisticated charging algorithm and potentially better battery health management compared to implementations that prioritize speed over longevity. The Honor X60 GT's 47% in 15 minutes indicates a different charging curve, potentially peaking early and slowing down significantly.
❓ Is the Dimensity 9000 in the OnePlus Ace 2V as good as the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1?
In many real-world scenarios, the Dimensity 9000 performs comparably to, and sometimes even surpasses, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, particularly in sustained performance due to its superior thermal efficiency. While the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 might have a slight edge in raw GPU power, the Dimensity 9000’s overall balance of CPU, GPU, and power efficiency makes it a strong contender.
