Honor has positioned both the X60 GT and X50 GT as performance-focused mid-range contenders, both powered by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. However, key differences in charging speed and CPU clock speeds create distinct user experiences. This comparison dives deep into these nuances to determine which device delivers the best balance of power and practicality.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing absolute charging speed and sustained performance, the Honor X60 GT is the clear winner. Its 80W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the slightly higher CPU clock speeds offer a marginal, but measurable, performance advantage. However, the X50 GT remains a compelling option for those seeking a more affordable experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 22 | 2024, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 22 | Available. Released 2024, January 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 161 x 74.2 x 7.7 mm (6.34 x 2.92 x 0.30 in) | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Aluminosilicate glass | - |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2664 pixels (~436 ppi density) | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.5 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 5000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 13, MagicOS 7.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens, AF | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, ultrasound proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 47% in 15 min
5W reverse wired | 35W wired
7.5W reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6300 mAh | Li-Po 5800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silver, Blue, Black | Black, Silver |
| Models | AGI-AN00 | ALP-AN00 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 260 EUR |
Honor X60 GT
- Faster 80W charging for quicker top-ups
- Slightly higher CPU clock speeds for improved performance
- 5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Potentially higher price point
- May run slightly warmer under sustained load
Honor X50 GT
- More affordable price
- Still offers excellent Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- 7.5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Slower 35W charging
- Slightly lower CPU clock speeds
Display Comparison
Both devices are expected to feature similar LCD panels, given their positioning. However, detailed display specs (resolution, refresh rate, peak brightness) are missing. The absence of LTPO technology suggests neither phone will offer adaptive refresh rates for optimal battery efficiency. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of this price segment. Color accuracy will likely be decent, but not flagship-level.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are unavailable. Given the market segment, we can anticipate similar camera setups focused on versatility rather than exceptional image quality. The absence of information suggests neither phone features a particularly groundbreaking camera system. Expect a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. Image processing will likely prioritize vibrant colors and social media-friendly aesthetics. The lack of OIS is a likely omission at this price point.
Performance
Both the X60 GT and X50 GT utilize the Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The key difference lies in the CPU configuration. The X60 GT boasts a 3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 prime core, compared to the X50 GT’s 3.0 GHz Cortex-X2. This 200 MHz difference, coupled with slightly higher A710 core clocks (2.75 GHz vs 2.5 GHz), translates to a small performance edge for the X60 GT in CPU-intensive tasks. Both phones share 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 efficiency cores. While both will handle demanding games, the X60 GT may exhibit slightly smoother performance in sustained workloads. Thermal management will be crucial; the 4nm process helps, but prolonged gaming could still lead to throttling.
Battery Life
The X60 GT’s 80W wired charging is a significant advantage, capable of adding 47% charge in just 15 minutes. This drastically reduces charging time compared to the X50 GT’s 35W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the X60 GT effectively mitigates any potential capacity difference. The X60 GT also offers 5W reverse wired charging, while the X50 GT provides 7.5W, a minor difference in practical use. The faster charging of the X60 GT is a major benefit for users who frequently top up their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X60 GT if you need the fastest possible charging and are a heavy user who values minimizing downtime. Its 80W charging and marginally faster CPU make it ideal for gamers and power users. Buy the Honor X50 GT if you prefer a more budget-friendly option and don't mind sacrificing some charging speed. It still delivers excellent performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, making it a great value for everyday tasks and moderate gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the X50 GT throttle during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a capable chip, but throttling is possible during prolonged, demanding gaming. The 4nm process helps mitigate heat, but sustained high loads will likely result in some performance reduction. The X60 GT's slightly higher clock speeds *may* offer a marginal advantage in delaying throttling, but both phones will benefit from using a game booster app and managing background processes.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the X60 GT compared to the 35W charging on the X50 GT in real-world use?
The 80W charging on the X60 GT is substantially faster. Honor claims 47% charge in 15 minutes. The X50 GT’s 35W charging will take considerably longer to reach the same charge level. For users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery, the X60 GT’s charging speed is a significant advantage.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speed between the X60 GT and X50 GT noticeable in everyday tasks?
The 200 MHz difference in the prime core clock speed is unlikely to be noticeable in most everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and video playback. The difference will be more apparent in CPU-intensive applications like video editing or demanding games, but even then, the impact will be relatively small.
