The Honor X6 and Oppo A57s represent compelling options in the ultra-competitive budget smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver essential functionality at an accessible price point, but they diverge in key areas like processing power and charging technology. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A57s emerges as the better choice. While both phones utilize Mediatek’s Helio series, the A57s’ Helio G35, with its higher clock speeds, provides a noticeable performance edge. Crucially, the 33W fast charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the Honor X6’s slow 10W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 21 | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 21 | Available. Released 2022, September 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Panda Glass), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.1 x 8.7 mm (6.44 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) | 163.8 x 75 x 8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| | - | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes (VNE-LX1 only) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 69 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Titanium Silver, Midnight Black | Starry Black, Sky Blue |
| Models | VNE-LX1, VNE-LX2, VNE-LX3 | CPH2385 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | - |
Honor X6
- Potentially lower price point
- Adequate for basic smartphone tasks
- Reliable Mediatek chipset
- Significantly slower charging (10W)
- Lower CPU clock speeds compared to Oppo A57s
- Likely less responsive user interface
Oppo A57s
- Faster CPU clock speeds (Helio G35)
- 33W fast charging (69-minute full charge)
- More responsive user experience
- Likely a higher price tag
- Similar camera capabilities to Honor X6
- Still limited for demanding gaming
Display Comparison
Neither Honor nor Oppo provide display specifications beyond the basic panel type. Given the price bracket, both likely utilize LCD panels. The absence of details like peak brightness or color gamut makes a direct comparison impossible. However, the focus here is on performance, not display fidelity, as both will offer a standard viewing experience for the price.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a meaningful comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and depth sensor, with the Oppo A57s potentially offering a slightly more refined image processing pipeline due to its newer chipset. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering minimal practical benefit due to the low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A57s features the Mediatek Helio G35, boasting a CPU with four cores clocked at 2.3 GHz and another four at 1.8 GHz. This contrasts with the Honor X6’s Helio G25, which runs at 2.0 GHz and 1.5 GHz respectively. While both are octa-core designs using the Cortex-A53 architecture, the higher clock speeds of the G35 translate to faster application loading times and a more responsive user interface. The G35’s slightly improved GPU will also offer a marginally better gaming experience, though neither phone is designed for demanding titles. Both devices will likely be paired with a similar amount of RAM, further emphasizing the chipset as the primary performance differentiator.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified, the real differentiator is charging speed. The Oppo A57s supports 33W wired charging, capable of a full charge in approximately 69 minutes. The Honor X6 is limited to a sluggish 10W charging, meaning a full charge will take considerably longer – likely exceeding two hours. This difference in charging speed significantly impacts the user experience, especially for those who rely heavily on their phone throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X6 if your primary needs are basic smartphone functions – calls, texts, and light social media – and you prioritize a potentially lower initial cost. Battery life will be adequate for these tasks, but be prepared for slow charging. Buy the Oppo A57s if you value a smoother user experience, occasional gaming, and significantly faster charging. The performance uplift and convenience of 33W charging justify the likely price premium for users who aren't strictly budget-constrained.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A57s handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty?
While the Helio G35 is capable of running these games, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a playable frame rate. Neither phone is a dedicated gaming device, but the A57s offers a slightly better experience due to its more powerful chipset.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Oppo A57s compared to the 10W charging on the Honor X6?
The Oppo A57s can fully charge in approximately 69 minutes, while the Honor X6 will likely take over two hours. This means you can get a significant charge in a much shorter amount of time with the A57s, reducing downtime and increasing convenience.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speed between the Helio G25 and Helio G35 noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the higher clock speeds of the Helio G35 in the Oppo A57s will result in snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall user experience. While not a massive leap, it's a tangible improvement over the Honor X6.
