The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor X50 and Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro represent compelling options. The X50 focuses on efficiency with its Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Poco F5 Pro aims for flagship-level performance with the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 delivers significantly superior performance, and the 67W charging is a substantial advantage. While the Honor X50 offers respectable efficiency, the Poco F5 Pro provides a more future-proof and versatile experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, July 05 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July 05 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired
6W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5800 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver, Orange | Black, White |
| Models | ALI-AN00 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 180 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor X50
- More affordable price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset
- 6W reverse wired charging
- Significantly lower performance than the Poco F5 Pro
- Slower charging speeds (35W)
- Likely less advanced camera system
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- 67W wired charging with fast charging protocols
- 30W wireless charging
- Higher price tag
- Potentially higher power consumption
- May run warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1059 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors compared to the Honor X50 (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the Poco F5 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks. The absence of refresh rate data for the X50 means the F5 Pro likely has a smoother experience. Bezels are assumed to be comparable given the market segment, but the F5 Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specs are missing. However, given the Poco F5 Pro’s positioning, it likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). The X50 likely focuses on providing adequate image quality for social media and casual photography. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the F5 Pro’s higher-tier chipset suggests superior image processing capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a significant leap over the Honor X50’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm). The 8+ Gen 1 features a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside Cortex-A710 performance cores, offering substantially higher CPU and GPU performance. The X50’s Cortex-A78 cores, while efficient, can’t match the raw power. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a far superior gaming experience on the Poco F5 Pro. The F5 Pro’s LPDDR5X RAM (assumed) further enhances performance compared to the X50’s likely LPDDR4X configuration.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 99 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite the Poco F5 Pro’s more powerful processor. This suggests efficient power management on both sides. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Poco F5 Pro’s 67W wired charging, with a 50% charge in 15 minutes, is significantly faster than the Honor X50’s 35W charging. The addition of 30W wireless charging on the Poco F5 Pro provides further convenience. The X50 does offer 6W reverse wired charging, a niche feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X50 if you prioritize long-term battery life and a more affordable price point, and your usage primarily revolves around everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light multimedia consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you demand high performance for gaming, demanding apps, and content creation, and value faster charging speeds and a more responsive user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the Honor X50 struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 is a mid-range chip and will likely require significant graphics settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates in demanding titles like Genshin Impact. The Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 will provide a much smoother and more consistent gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco F5 Pro compared to the 35W charging on the Honor X50 in real-world use?
The Poco F5 Pro’s 67W charging can take a phone from 0% to 50% in approximately 15 minutes, while the Honor X50’s 35W charging will take considerably longer – likely closer to 45-60 minutes to reach the same level. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the Poco F5 Pro get noticeably warmer than the Honor X50 during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Poco F5 Pro is a more powerful chip and will generate more heat under sustained load. While Xiaomi likely implements thermal management solutions, it's reasonable to expect the F5 Pro to get warmer than the Honor X50 during prolonged gaming. This could potentially lead to some thermal throttling, but the performance gains will likely outweigh the heat.
