The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor X50 and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The X50 focuses on a balance of features and affordability, powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. Conversely, the Edge 40 Neo prioritizes rapid charging and a vibrant display, leveraging the MediaTek Dimensity 7030. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid replenishment, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the clear winner. Its 68W charging, capable of a 50% charge in just 15 minutes, significantly outperforms the Honor X50’s 35W charging. However, the X50’s more efficient 4nm chipset offers a potential edge in sustained performance and thermal management.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, July 05 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July 05 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired
6W reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver, Orange | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | ALI-AN00 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Honor X50
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset
- Potential for better sustained performance
- Likely more affordable price point
- Slower 35W charging
- Display likely less bright than Edge 40 Neo
- Limited camera information available
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- 68W fast charging (50% in 15 minutes)
- Brighter 1073 nit display
- Strong battery endurance (10:28h active use)
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Potential for more thermal throttling
- Camera specs largely unknown
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This is a substantial advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the Honor X50, which lacks published brightness data but is expected to be lower. While both likely utilize OLED panels for vibrant colors, the Edge 40 Neo’s higher peak brightness and potentially better color calibration (based on Motorola’s display tuning) provide a superior viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rates to conserve battery, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brighter panel will consume more power at maximum brightness.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by limited data. Both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, but the specifics beyond 'Photo / Video' capabilities for the Edge 40 Neo are unknown. The absence of sensor size or aperture information makes a direct comparison difficult. It’s reasonable to assume Motorola will leverage its image processing expertise to deliver competitive results, but without concrete specs, it’s impossible to definitively declare a winner. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing feature with limited practical benefit, and should not be a deciding factor.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030, built on a 6nm process, features a CPU configuration with 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the Honor X50’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm) which utilizes 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the Dimensity 7030 has higher clocked prime cores, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 benefits from a more efficient 4nm manufacturing process. This suggests the X50 will likely exhibit better thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less performance throttling during prolonged, demanding tasks like gaming. The 4nm node allows for higher transistor density and lower power consumption, a key advantage for sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the charging department with its 68W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes. This is a significant advantage over the Honor X50’s 35W charging. While the Honor X50’s battery capacity is not specified, the Edge 40 Neo’s endurance rating of 80 hours and active use score of 10:28h indicates strong battery life. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1’s 4nm efficiency could partially offset the charging speed difference, but the Edge 40 Neo’s faster charging will be more convenient for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X50 if you need a phone that can handle extended gaming sessions or multitasking without significant throttling, and you aren't overly concerned with the fastest possible charging speeds. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize a bright, vivid display and the convenience of incredibly fast charging, making it ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost throughout the day.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7030 is a capable chipset, its 6nm manufacturing process is less efficient than the 4nm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the Honor X50. This means the Edge 40 Neo is more likely to experience thermal throttling during extended gaming, potentially leading to reduced frame rates over time. However, Motorola’s thermal management solutions may mitigate this issue to some extent.
❓ How significant is the charging speed difference between 35W and 68W, and will I notice it in daily use?
The difference is substantial. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging can add a 50% charge in just 15 minutes, while the Honor X50’s 35W charging will take considerably longer. For users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly, the Edge 40 Neo offers a significant convenience advantage. This is especially useful for those with busy schedules or who often forget to charge overnight.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specifications for the Motorola Edge 40 Neo a cause for concern?
It's a valid concern. Without knowing the sensor size, aperture, or image processing algorithms, it's difficult to assess the Edge 40 Neo’s camera performance. Motorola generally delivers competitive camera experiences, but the absence of specifics makes it harder to predict its capabilities compared to the Honor X50, even if the X50 also lacks detailed specs.
