Honor X50 vs Google Pixel 7a: Which Mid-Range Champion Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Tensor G2 chipset and exceptional image processing deliver consistently impressive results. However, the Honor X50 offers excellent value and a larger battery, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor X50 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, July 05 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, July 05 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 35W wired 6W reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5800 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver, Orange | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | ALI-AN00 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Honor X50
- Faster 35W charging
- Potentially longer battery life
- More affordable price point
- Less powerful processor
- Inferior camera performance (likely)
- Less refined software experience
Google Pixel 7a
- Superior camera quality
- More powerful Tensor G2 chipset
- Smoother software experience with guaranteed updates
- Slower 18W charging
- Higher price
- Potentially shorter battery life
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1070 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Honor X50. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the X50’s panel technology isn’t specified, the Pixel 7a’s OLED panel delivers vibrant colors and deep blacks. Both likely utilize a standard 60Hz refresh rate, but the Pixel 7a’s superior brightness and color accuracy give it a clear edge for media consumption and everyday use.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a major strength. While specific sensor details are missing for both, Google’s computational photography prowess, powered by the Tensor G2, elevates image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a excels in dynamic range, low-light performance, and overall image clarity. The Honor X50 likely relies more on hardware specifications, and without knowing those details, it’s difficult to assess its capabilities. The Pixel 7a’s video recording capabilities are also expected to be superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s image signal processor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 (5nm) features a prime Cortex-X1 core clocked at 2.85 GHz, offering significantly higher peak performance than the Honor X50’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm). While the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 is efficient, its Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz are less powerful. The Tensor G2’s 5nm process also contributes to better thermal management under sustained loads. This means the Pixel 7a will handle demanding tasks like video editing and gaming more smoothly. The X50 will be adequate for everyday tasks, but will show its limitations in more intensive scenarios.
Battery Life
The Honor X50’s 35W wired charging is considerably faster than the Pixel 7a’s 18W charging. This means the X50 can replenish its battery much quicker. While the Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, this is a lab test and doesn’t reflect real-world usage. The X50’s larger battery capacity (unspecified, but likely larger than the Pixel 7a’s) combined with the efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 should provide excellent battery life. The X50 also offers 6W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Pixel 7a.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X50 if you need a long-lasting battery, prioritize value for money, and are comfortable with a less refined software experience. It’s ideal for users who consume a lot of media and don’t demand the absolute best in mobile gaming or photography. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prefer a premium camera experience, seamless software updates, and the power of Google’s AI features. It’s best suited for photography enthusiasts and users who rely heavily on Google’s ecosystem.