Honor X50 Pro vs Xiaomi 13 Pro: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon Power and Charging Speed
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and the fastest charging, the Xiaomi 13 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers a noticeable performance uplift and superior efficiency, complemented by 120W wired and 50W wireless charging. However, the Honor X50 Pro presents a strong value proposition for those seeking near-flagship performance without the premium price tag.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor X50 Pro | Xiaomi 13 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 29 | 2022, December 11 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, December 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or silicone polymer back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 210 g or 229 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 1080p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, ultrasound proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 35W wired 7.5W reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 36 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5800 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black, Ceramic Flora Green, Mountain Blue |
| Models | ALP-AN00 | 2210132G, 2210132C |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 750 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1281666 (v9) GeekBench: 5087 (v5.1), 5323 (v6) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor X50 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Still offers flagship-level performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Decent battery life
- Significantly slower charging speeds (35W)
- Lacks wireless charging
- Potentially inferior display quality
Xiaomi 13 Pro
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for superior performance
- Ultra-fast 120W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Brighter and potentially higher-quality display
- Higher price tag
- May be overkill for basic users
- Potential for more heat generation under sustained load (though mitigated by 8 Gen 2 efficiency)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1253 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Honor X50 Pro. While both likely utilize high-quality OLED panels, the Xiaomi’s higher brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior panel capable of deeper blacks. Details regarding the X50 Pro’s panel technology (LTPO, PWM dimming rate) are missing, but these factors would be crucial for discerning display quality and eye comfort.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are equipped with capable camera systems, but detailed specifications are limited. Both are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities. The Xiaomi 13 Pro is expected to have a more advanced camera system, potentially including larger sensors and more sophisticated image processing algorithms, given its flagship positioning. Without specific sensor size or aperture information for the Honor X50 Pro, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s camera system is likely to excel in low-light photography and video recording due to its superior hardware and software.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) represents a generational leap over the Honor X50 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The 8 Gen 2 features a newer CPU architecture – Cortex-X3 vs Cortex-X2 – and improved GPU performance. The 8 Gen 2’s CPU configuration (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) offers higher clock speeds and more efficient cores compared to the X50 Pro’s (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510). This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better sustained performance during demanding tasks like gaming. While both use a 4nm process, the architectural improvements in the 8 Gen 2 provide better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13 Pro shines in the battery and charging department. Its 120W wired charging can fully charge the device in just 19 minutes, a significant advantage over the Honor X50 Pro’s 35W charging. The Xiaomi also supports 50W wireless charging (36 minutes to full) and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent or significantly slower on the X50 Pro (7.5W reverse wired). While both phones achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours and the Xiaomi 13 Pro has an active use score of 10:55h, the faster charging speeds of the Xiaomi 13 Pro provide a more convenient user experience, minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X50 Pro if you need a powerful phone for everyday tasks and gaming, but are budget-conscious and don't require the absolute fastest charging or wireless charging capabilities. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Pro if you demand the best possible performance, fastest charging speeds (both wired and wireless), and are willing to pay a premium for a complete flagship experience.