Honor X50 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy S23+: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy S23+ is the superior choice. While the Honor X50 Pro offers excellent value, the S23+'s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides a noticeable performance uplift, superior battery endurance (111h rating), and the added convenience of wireless charging. The S23+ justifies its higher price with a more refined overall experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor X50 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S23+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (Dual SIM model only) |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 7, 28, 41, 66, 71, 78, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 29 | 2023, February 01 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2023, February 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 157.8 x 76.2 x 7.6 mm (6.21 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM and eSIM or Dual SIM (2 Nano-SIMs and eSIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Armor aluminum frame with tougher drop and scratch resistance (advertised) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.3 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1750 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, One UI 5.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 70mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 1080p@960fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Dual video call, Auto-HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), Dual Pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, ultrasound proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Samsung DeX, Samsung Wireless DeX (desktop experience support) Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 35W wired 7.5W reverse wired | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min (advertised) 15W wireless (Qi/PMA) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5800 mAh | Li-Ion 4700 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green | Phantom Black, Cream, Green, Lavender, Graphite, Lime |
| Models | ALP-AN00 | SM-S916B, SM-S916B/DS, SM-S916U, SM-S916U1, SM-S916W, SM-S916N, SM-S9160, SM-S916E, SM-S916E/DS |
| Price | About 360 EUR | $ 780.00 / C$ 1,399.99 / £ 919.08 / € 1,185.89 / ₹ 94,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.95 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.77 W/kg (head) 1.45 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 111h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1234077 (v9) GeekBench: 5073 (v5.1) GFXBench: 110fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor X50 Pro
- Excellent value for the price
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
- Fast 35W wired charging
- Lacks wireless charging
- Potentially less refined software experience
- Limited camera information
Samsung Galaxy S23+
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Excellent battery life (111h endurance)
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Higher price point
- May be overkill for basic users
- Charging speed not dramatically faster than X50 Pro
Display Comparison
The Galaxy S23+ boasts an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting a high-quality OLED panel, though specific peak brightness data is missing. The Honor X50 Pro’s display specs are not provided, making a direct comparison difficult. However, Samsung’s displays are generally known for their color accuracy and outdoor visibility. The S23+'s likely higher peak brightness will translate to a better viewing experience in direct sunlight. The absence of LTPO information for the X50 Pro suggests it may lack the adaptive refresh rate technology found in many flagships, potentially impacting battery life during dynamic content viewing.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs for the Honor X50 Pro are unavailable, hindering a precise comparison. However, the Samsung Galaxy S23+ is expected to feature a sophisticated camera system with advanced image processing. The S23+'s likely larger main sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS) will deliver superior low-light performance and sharper images. While the X50 Pro may offer a competitive camera experience, the S23+’s established reputation and advanced features give it an edge. We can assume the S23+ will offer more versatile video recording capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy S23+’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Honor X50 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The Gen 2 features the newer Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.36 GHz versus the X50 Pro’s 3.0 GHz Cortex-X2. This, combined with improvements to the A715 and A710 cores in the Gen 2, results in faster processing speeds and improved efficiency. While both are 4nm chips, the Gen 2’s architecture minimizes thermal throttling during sustained workloads, making it the better choice for demanding tasks like video editing and prolonged gaming. The S23+ also benefits from potentially faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S23+ boasts an endurance rating of 111 hours, indicating excellent battery life. The Honor X50 Pro’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 35W wired charging is slower than the S23+'s 45W wired charging (advertised 65% in 30 minutes). The S23+ also adds the convenience of 15W wireless charging and 4.5W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the X50 Pro. While the X50 Pro offers 7.5W reverse wired charging, the S23+'s wireless capabilities provide greater flexibility. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s improved efficiency further contributes to the S23+'s longer battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X50 Pro if you prioritize maximizing performance-per-dollar and are comfortable with a slightly less polished software experience and slower charging. It’s ideal for gamers on a budget and those who don’t require wireless charging. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S23+ if you value a consistently smooth experience, longer battery life, faster charging speeds, and the convenience of wireless charging, even at a higher price point. It’s the better choice for power users and those invested in the Samsung ecosystem.