The Honor X50 Pro and Oppo Find X6 Pro represent compelling choices in the premium Android space, but cater to different priorities. The X50 Pro aims to deliver flagship-level performance at a more accessible price point, leveraging the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. The Find X6 Pro, meanwhile, is a no-compromise flagship boasting the latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and a focus on rapid charging and display quality. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and the fastest possible charging, the Oppo Find X6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers a performance edge and superior efficiency, complemented by 100W wired and 50W wireless charging. However, the Honor X50 Pro provides excellent value for those seeking near-flagship performance without the premium price tag.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, December 29 | 2023, March 21 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) | 164.8 x 76.2 x 9.1 mm or 9.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 216 g or 218 g (7.62 oz) |
| | - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz | LTPO3 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1500 nits (HBM), 2500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 4.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, ultrasound proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired
7.5W reverse wired | 100W wired, PD, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 30 min
50W wireless, 50% in 22 min, 100% in 51 min
10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green | Black, Green, Brown |
| Models | ALP-AN00 | PGEM110, PGEM10 |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 820 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 114h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.1 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1294797 (v9)
GeekBench: 4791 (v5.1), 5226 (v6)
GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor X50 Pro
- Excellent value for money
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
- Decent battery life
- Slower charging speeds
- Less advanced camera system (likely)
- Older processor generation
Oppo Find X6 Pro
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor
- Ultra-fast 100W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Brighter and potentially more efficient display
- Higher price point
- May run hotter under sustained load (though Gen 2 is more efficient)
- Premium price may not justify the upgrade for all users
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1318 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Honor X50 Pro. While the Honor X50 Pro’s display specs are missing, the Oppo’s high peak brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. The Oppo’s display technology is likely LTPO, enabling adaptive refresh rates for improved power efficiency, a feature not confirmed for the Honor X50 Pro.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are described as having capable photo/video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Honor X50 Pro. The Oppo Find X6 Pro likely features a more advanced camera system, benefiting from the newer image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The Oppo’s camera system is expected to excel in low-light conditions and offer more sophisticated image processing algorithms. Without specific details on the Honor X50 Pro’s camera hardware, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison beyond the chipset’s processing capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X6 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) represents a substantial upgrade over the Honor X50 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm). The Gen 2 features a newer CPU architecture – Cortex-X3 vs Cortex-X2 – and improved GPU performance. The Gen 2’s CPU configuration (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) offers higher clock speeds and architectural improvements over the X50 Pro’s (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710, 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510). This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. While both use a 4nm process, the Gen 2 is more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Oppo Find X6 Pro’s 100W wired charging can replenish the battery to 100% in just 30 minutes, with a 45% charge achievable in 10 minutes. It also supports 50W wireless charging (full charge in 51 minutes) and 10W reverse wireless charging. The Honor X50 Pro is limited to 35W wired charging and 7.5W reverse wired charging, making it significantly slower to charge. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Oppo’s faster charging mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X50 Pro if you need a powerful phone for everyday tasks and gaming, but are budget-conscious and don't require the absolute fastest charging or latest processor. Buy the Oppo Find X6 Pro if you prioritize top-tier performance, incredibly fast charging (both wired and wireless), and a premium display experience, and are willing to pay a premium for these features.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Honor X50 Pro struggle with sustained gaming performance compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2?
While the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a capable chip, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the Oppo Find X6 Pro offers a noticeable advantage in sustained gaming. The Gen 2’s improved thermal efficiency and architectural enhancements allow it to maintain higher clock speeds for longer periods, resulting in fewer frame drops and a smoother gaming experience, especially in demanding titles.
❓ How much faster is the 100W charging on the Oppo Find X6 Pro compared to the 35W charging on the Honor X50 Pro in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Oppo Find X6 Pro can charge from 0-100% in approximately 30 minutes, while the Honor X50 Pro will take considerably longer – likely over an hour. This means you can quickly top up the Oppo during short breaks, whereas the Honor X50 Pro requires a more significant charging window.
❓ Is the camera on the Oppo Find X6 Pro significantly better than what we can expect from the Honor X50 Pro, given the lack of detailed camera specs for the Honor?
It's highly probable. The Oppo Find X6 Pro benefits from the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2's advanced ISP and likely features a more sophisticated camera system with larger sensors and improved optics. While the Honor X50 Pro may take good photos, the Oppo is expected to excel in low-light conditions, dynamic range, and overall image quality.
