The Realme GT Neo 5 240W and Honor X40 GT represent distinct approaches to delivering a high-performance smartphone experience. The Realme aggressively prioritizes charging speed, while the Honor focuses on balancing performance with a more established chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw speed and future-proofing, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and revolutionary 240W charging significantly outperform the Honor X40 GT’s Snapdragon 888 and 66W charging, despite the Honor’s potentially more refined software experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 13 | 2023, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 18 | Available. Released 2023, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 75.8 x 8.5 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199.5 g (7.05 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | Illuminated RGB (on the back) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 90% in 30 min
5W reverse wired | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Racing Black, Black, Silver | Purple, Black, White |
| Models | ADT-AN00 | RMX3708 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | About 440 EUR |
Honor X40 GT
- Balanced performance with Snapdragon 888
- Potentially more refined software experience
- 5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Significantly slower 66W charging
- Older Snapdragon 888 chipset
- May throttle under sustained load
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Revolutionary 240W charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset
- Improved thermal efficiency
- Potential software quirks
- May prioritize speed over battery optimization
- Higher price point (potentially)
Display Comparison
While display specifications aren't provided, both phones likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED panels common in this price bracket. However, the Realme GT Neo 5, given its flagship aspirations, may incorporate a slightly brighter panel and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, improving battery efficiency. The Honor X40 GT, being positioned as a 'GT' model, should still offer a vibrant and responsive display, but may lack the advanced features of the Realme.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given the Realme GT Neo 5’s positioning, it’s likely to feature a more advanced primary sensor with a larger aperture for improved low-light performance. The Realme’s image processing algorithms may also prioritize vibrant colors and dynamic range, while the Honor might lean towards a more natural look. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the Realme would be a significant advantage for video recording and steady shots. We can assume both phones will include standard ultrawide and macro lenses, but their quality will likely vary.
Performance
The Realme GT Neo 5 240W’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) represents a significant leap over the Honor X40 GT’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm). The 8+ Gen 1’s smaller node translates to improved thermal efficiency and sustained performance under load, crucial for extended gaming sessions. The 8+ Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 prime core, clocked at 3.19 GHz, also offers a performance advantage over the 888’s Cortex-X1 at 2.84 GHz. While both utilize octa-core configurations, the newer architecture of the 8+ Gen 1 provides a noticeable edge in both CPU and GPU performance. The Realme also benefits from potentially faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo 5 240W’s defining feature is its 240W charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 4 minutes and 100% in 10 minutes. This is a game-changer for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The Honor X40 GT’s 66W charging, while respectable, pales in comparison, taking approximately 30 minutes to reach 90%. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Realme’s incredibly fast charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery, offering a more convenient charging experience. The 5W reverse wired charging on the Honor is a niche feature, useful for charging accessories but not a primary selling point.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X40 GT if you need a reliable performer for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, and value a potentially more stable software experience. It’s ideal for users who don’t demand the absolute fastest charging or the latest chipset. Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you prioritize blazing-fast charging, demanding gaming performance, and are willing to accept potential software quirks for a more cutting-edge experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Realme GT Neo 5 240W’s 240W charging degrade the battery faster?
While extremely fast charging has historically raised battery health concerns, Realme has implemented technologies like GaN chargers and intelligent charging algorithms to minimize heat generation and optimize charging cycles. These measures aim to mitigate potential long-term battery degradation, but long-term testing is needed to confirm its impact.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 888 in the Honor X40 GT still capable of handling demanding games?
The Snapdragon 888 remains a capable chipset for gaming, but it’s prone to thermal throttling under sustained load. While it can run most games at high settings, you may experience frame drops or reduced performance during extended gaming sessions compared to the more efficient Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Realme GT Neo 5 240W.
❓ Does the Realme GT Neo 5 240W support bypass charging?
Given Realme's focus on gaming, it's highly probable the GT Neo 5 240W supports bypass charging. This allows the phone to be powered directly from the charger while gaming, reducing heat buildup and improving sustained performance. However, official confirmation from Realme is needed.
