Honor continues to deliver compelling mid-range smartphones, but choosing between the X40 GT and X9a can be tricky. Both offer attractive designs and features, but cater to different priorities. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone is the right fit for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor X40 GT is the clear performance winner thanks to its Snapdragon 888 chipset. However, the X9a boasts a stunning curved display and potentially better camera versatility. If raw power is your priority, the X40 GT wins; otherwise, the X9a offers a more refined experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 13 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 18 | Available. Released 2023, January 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 75.8 x 8.5 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 161.6 x 73.9 x 7.9 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199.5 g (7.05 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MagicOS 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 90% in 30 min
5W reverse wired | 40W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5100 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Racing Black, Black, Silver | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black |
| Models | ADT-AN00 | RMO-NX1 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 212.08 |
Honor X40 GT
- Exceptional Performance (Snapdragon 888)
- Fast 66W Charging
- 120Hz Refresh Rate
- Competitive Price
- LCD Display (compared to AMOLED)
- Potentially Less Versatile Camera
- Design less premium than X9a
Honor X9a
- Stunning Curved AMOLED Display
- Stylish Design
- Versatile Camera System (likely)
- 40W Fast Charging
- Lower Performance (Snapdragon 695)
- Slower Charging than X40 GT
- Less Powerful for Gaming
Display Comparison
The Honor X9a features a gorgeous 6.67-inch curved AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The X40 GT has a 6.67-inch LCD display with a 120Hz refresh rate. While the X40 GT's display is perfectly adequate, the X9a's AMOLED panel provides a superior viewing experience with deeper blacks and better contrast.
Camera Comparison
The X9a likely has a more versatile camera system, potentially including a dedicated ultrawide lens and macro lens, alongside a main sensor. The X40 GT's camera setup is likely more focused on the main sensor. Image quality will depend on specific sensor sizes and software processing, but the X9a's versatility gives it an edge.
Performance
This is where the X40 GT truly shines. Its Snapdragon 888 chipset is significantly more powerful than the X9a's Snapdragon 695. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a much better gaming experience on the X40 GT. The X9a is still capable for everyday tasks, but struggles with more demanding games.
Battery Life
The X40 GT's 66W charging is faster than the X9a's 40W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups. Both phones likely have similar battery capacities (around 4800-5000mAh), so battery life should be comparable under normal usage, with the X40 GT potentially offering slightly longer life due to more efficient chipset.
Buying Guide
The Honor X40 GT is ideal for gamers and users who demand fast performance for demanding apps. The Honor X9a is a better choice for those prioritizing a beautiful display, a more balanced camera system, and a slightly more stylish design, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Honor X40 GT good for gaming?
Yes, the Honor X40 GT is excellent for gaming thanks to its powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset. It can handle most games at high settings.
❓ Which phone has the better display?
The Honor X9a has the better display with its vibrant AMOLED panel and curved design. The X40 GT's LCD is still good, but not as visually impressive.