Honor continues to deliver compelling mid-range smartphones, and the X40 GT and Honor 70 are prime examples. But which one offers the best overall experience? This in-depth comparison will analyze their key features, performance, and value to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor X40 GT takes the performance crown thanks to its Snapdragon 888 chipset. However, the Honor 70 boasts a brighter display and potentially better camera capabilities. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your priorities: raw power or a more refined multimedia experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 13 | 2022, May 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 18 | Available. Released 2022, June 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 75.8 x 8.5 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 161.4 x 73.3 x 7.9 mm (6.35 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199.5 g (7.05 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 144Hz | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", PDAF
50 MP, f/2.2, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 90% in 30 min
5W reverse wired | 66W wired, 60% in 20 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Racing Black, Black, Silver | Midnight Black, Emerald Green, Icelandic Frost, Crystal Silver |
| Models | ADT-AN00 | FNE-AN00, FNE-NX9 |
| Price | About 300 EUR | £ 201.00 / € 189.90 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 100h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.4 LUFS (Average)
|
Honor X40 GT
- Flagship-level performance (Snapdragon 888)
- Fast 66W charging
- Competitive price for the performance offered
- Reverse wired charging
- Potentially less refined camera system
- Display brightness not as high as Honor 70
- Design may be less premium
Honor 70
- Brighter display (790 nits)
- Excellent battery life (100h endurance rating)
- Potentially better camera system
- Stylish design
- Less powerful chipset (Snapdragon 778G+)
- Slower charging compared to X40 GT
- Infinite contrast ratio claim is vague
Display Comparison
The Honor 70's 790 nits peak brightness gives it a noticeable edge in outdoor visibility. While the X40 GT's display is good, it doesn't reach the same level of brightness. The Honor 70's 'infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term, but suggesting excellent contrast) further enhances its visual appeal. Both phones likely feature OLED panels for vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Honor 70 likely has a more refined camera system. The 778G+ chipset often pairs with better image processing algorithms. The X40 GT's camera is likely competent, but not a standout feature. Specific camera specs (megapixels, sensor size, aperture) would be needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
Here, the Honor X40 GT is the clear winner. The Snapdragon 888 is a flagship-level chipset, significantly more powerful than the Snapdragon 778G+ in the Honor 70. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and significantly better gaming performance on the X40 GT.
Battery Life
The Honor 70's endurance rating of 100h suggests exceptional battery life. While the X40 GT's 66W charging is faster (reaching 90% in 30 minutes), the Honor 70's larger battery capacity likely allows it to last longer on a single charge.
Buying Guide
The Honor X40 GT is ideal for gamers and users who prioritize performance and fast charging. The Honor 70 is a better fit for those who value a vibrant display, a stylish design, and a potentially more versatile camera system.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Honor X40 GT good for gaming?
Yes, the Honor X40 GT's Snapdragon 888 chipset makes it an excellent choice for mobile gaming, offering smooth performance even in demanding titles.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Honor 70 is expected to have better overall battery life due to its endurance rating of 100h, although the X40 GT charges significantly faster.