The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor X30i and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options. While both aim to deliver a 5G experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches to chipset choice and charging technology. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which phone offers the best overall package.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a generally smoother experience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a slight edge in sustained performance, despite the Dimensity 810's higher clock speeds.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 28 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 02 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 74.7 x 7.5 mm (6.43 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 5.0 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver, Rose Gold | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | TFY-AN00 | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Honor X30i
- Potentially lower price point
- Dimensity 810 offers decent performance for everyday tasks
- 6nm process for improved efficiency
- Significantly slower 22.5W charging
- Likely less refined camera system
- Potentially less optimized software
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- 67W fast charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support
- Snapdragon 695 offers better sustained performance
- Likely more advanced camera features
- Potentially higher price
- MIUI software can be polarizing
- Slightly lower peak CPU clock speeds
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a flagship-level display, but details are lacking to make a direct comparison. Both utilize 6nm chipsets, suggesting a focus on efficiency over raw graphical power, meaning display demands won't be overly taxing. We can assume both will offer adequate viewing experiences for typical use cases, but without knowing panel type (IPS vs AMOLED), resolution, or peak brightness, a definitive statement is impossible. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests standard refresh rate management.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a thorough comparison is limited. However, Xiaomi generally prioritizes camera features in its 'Pro+' models. We can infer that the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) likely features a more sophisticated camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Honor X30i will likely offer a competent camera for everyday photography, but may struggle in low-light conditions compared to a more feature-rich offering from Xiaomi. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely inconsequential.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Honor X30i features the Mediatek Dimensity 810, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G. While the Dimensity 810 boasts higher clock speeds on its prime cores (2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz on the Snapdragon), the Snapdragon 695 benefits from Qualcomm’s architectural optimizations and a generally more efficient design. The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, while clocked slightly lower, are often more efficient per clock cycle. This translates to potentially better sustained performance and thermal management under load. The 6nm process node is shared, minimizing the process node advantage. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is likely to offer a smoother experience during prolonged gaming or multitasking.
Battery Life
This is where the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) truly shines. Its 67W wired charging is a game-changer, capable of charging from 0-100% in a claimed 42 minutes. The Honor X30i’s 22.5W charging is significantly slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. Users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their phone will greatly benefit from the Redmi’s charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X30i if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It's a solid option for everyday tasks and light gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you value rapid charging, a more refined software experience (typically associated with Xiaomi's MIUI), and a chipset that handles demanding applications with slightly more composure.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 isn't a gaming powerhouse, it's capable of running Genshin Impact at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The key advantage over the Dimensity 810 is its better thermal management, meaning it's less likely to throttle performance during extended gaming sessions. Expect to make some graphical compromises for a smooth experience.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) compared to the 22.5W charging on the Honor X30i in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. Xiaomi advertises 0-100% in 42 minutes. The Honor X30i will likely take well over 1.5 hours to achieve the same result. This means you can quickly top up the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) during short breaks, while the Honor X30i requires a much longer charging commitment.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speeds between the Dimensity 810 and Snapdragon 695 noticeable in everyday tasks?
For typical usage like browsing, social media, and video streaming, the difference in CPU clock speeds is unlikely to be noticeable. Both chipsets are more than capable of handling these tasks smoothly. The Snapdragon 695's advantage lies in sustained performance and efficiency, not raw clock speed.
