The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor X30 and Xiaomi Poco F5 are two strong contenders vying for your attention. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Poco F5 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly more powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, brighter display, and impressive battery life. While the Honor X30 offers fast charging, the Poco F5's overall performance and features justify its slight price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 16 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 25 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 5.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 80% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver, Gold | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | ANY-AN00 | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 210 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
Honor X30
- Fast 66W Charging
- More Affordable
- Decent Display
- 5G Connectivity
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Lower Display Brightness
- Potentially Inferior Camera Performance
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
- Bright and Vibrant Display
- Excellent Battery Life
- Fast Charging (67W)
- Slightly Higher Price
- Design may not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 boasts a significant advantage with its 963 nits max brightness, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. Its contrast ratio is also superior. The Honor X30's display is adequate but lacks the vibrancy and brightness of the Poco F5. Both likely use AMOLED panels, but the Poco F5's implementation is noticeably better.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable cameras, the Poco F5 likely holds an edge in image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions, due to its more advanced chipset and image processing capabilities. Both likely feature a main sensor around 64MP, but the Poco F5's processing will be superior. Detailed camera specs are needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
The Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is a substantial upgrade over the Honor X30's Snapdragon 695. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and significantly better gaming performance on the Poco F5. The Poco F5's CPU architecture is also more modern and efficient.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 demonstrates exceptional battery life, with an active use score of 11:52h and an endurance rating of 118h. The Honor X30's battery life is respectable, but falls short of the Poco F5's longevity. The Poco F5's 67W charging is also competitive, charging to 100% in 46 minutes, while the Honor X30's 66W is slightly faster in practice.
Buying Guide
The Honor X30 is a good choice for users prioritizing fast charging and a more budget-friendly price. The Xiaomi Poco F5 is ideal for those seeking top-tier performance, a vibrant display, and long-lasting battery life, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Poco F5 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset and improved thermal management.
❓ Does the Honor X30 have a headphone jack?
Generally, Honor X30 models do not include a 3.5mm headphone jack. Please verify the specific model you are considering.
❓ What is the difference in camera quality?
While both have capable cameras, the Poco F5's more advanced chipset and image processing likely result in better image quality, especially in low light.
