The Honor X30 Max and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they diverge significantly in chipset choice and charging capabilities, creating a clear distinction for potential buyers. This comparison dives deep into these differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a generally smoother experience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the Honor X30 Max’s 22.5W, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a more refined software experience, despite the Dimensity 900’s theoretical CPU advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 28 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 02 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 174.4 x 84.9 x 8.3 mm (6.87 x 3.34 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 228 g (8.04 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~356 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.09 inches, 125.5 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 5.0 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver/Violet | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | KKG-AN70 | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Honor X30 Max
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Dimensity 900
- May offer a larger battery capacity (unconfirmed)
- Honor's Magic UI offers unique software features
- Significantly slower 22.5W charging
- Dimensity 900 may exhibit more thermal throttling
- Software optimization may not be as refined as Xiaomi
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- 67W fast charging with PD3.0 and QC3
- Snapdragon 695 offers a smoother, more efficient experience
- Likely better camera performance and image processing
- Potentially lower peak CPU performance compared to Dimensity 900
- May have a smaller battery capacity (unconfirmed)
- Xiaomi's MIUI can be resource-intensive
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. Without specific display specs (resolution, brightness, color gamut), the comparison hinges on panel quality, which is difficult to ascertain. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s potential for higher peak brightness, given Xiaomi’s display tuning, could offer better outdoor visibility. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will depend on software calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, but the quality will depend on sensor size and image processing. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) often emphasizes camera capabilities in its marketing, suggesting a potentially more refined camera experience. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the Redmi would be a significant advantage, especially in low-light conditions. We can assume both will include standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially macro lenses, but the main sensor size will be the determining factor in image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor X30 Max’s Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6nm) features a 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, theoretically offering higher peak CPU performance. However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While the Dimensity 900 has a clock speed advantage, Qualcomm’s Kryo cores and software optimization often translate to a smoother, more consistent experience. The Snapdragon 695 also benefits from Qualcomm’s Adreno GPU, potentially offering better gaming performance. RAM speed (LPDDR4X is likely on both) will be a minor factor, but thermal management will be crucial; the Snapdragon 695 is generally known for better efficiency.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) decisively wins in the charging department with its 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, achieving 50% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes. The Honor X30 Max’s 22.5W charging is significantly slower. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Redmi effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The Snapdragon 695’s efficiency also contributes to better battery life, potentially offsetting a smaller battery size compared to the Honor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X30 Max if you prioritize a potentially higher peak CPU performance for specific tasks and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you value fast charging, a more optimized software experience, and a generally more responsive daily user experience, even if it means a slight trade-off in raw CPU power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
While not a flagship chipset, the Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG and Genshin Impact at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Optimization plays a key role, and Xiaomi’s Game Turbo mode can help improve performance. However, users seeking a consistently high-framerate experience at maximum settings may need to consider a more powerful device.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between 22.5W and 67W? Will I notice a real-world impact?
The difference is substantial. 22.5W charging will take over two hours to fully charge the Honor X30 Max, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) can reach 100% in just 42 minutes. This means less time tethered to a charger and more time using your phone, making the 67W charging a significant convenience factor.
❓ Is the Dimensity 900 in the Honor X30 Max better for multitasking than the Snapdragon 695?
The Dimensity 900's higher clock speeds *suggest* better multitasking capabilities on paper. However, Qualcomm's Snapdragon 695, coupled with MIUI's memory management, often provides a smoother multitasking experience in practice. The real-world difference will likely be minimal for most users.
