The Realme GT Neo 3T and Honor X30 Max represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The GT Neo 3T aims for performance with its Snapdragon 870, while the X30 Max focuses on delivering a large-screen experience at a more accessible price point. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and rapid charging, the Realme GT Neo 3T is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset and 80W charging significantly outperform the Honor X30 Max's Dimensity 900 and 22.5W charging. However, the X30 Max offers a strong value proposition for those seeking a large display and acceptable performance on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 28 | 2022, June 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 02 | Available. Released 2022, June 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 174.4 x 84.9 x 8.3 mm (6.87 x 3.34 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 228 g (8.04 oz) | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~356 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.09 inches, 125.5 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, HDR10 | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 5.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 80W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver/Violet | Shade Black, Drifting White, Dash Yellow |
| Models | KKG-AN70 | RMX3372, RMX3371 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 780 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.2 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 726007 (v9)
GeekBench: 3180 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor X30 Max
- Large display size for immersive media consumption
- Competitive price point offering excellent value
- Acceptable performance for everyday tasks
- Slower charging speed (22.5W)
- Less powerful processor compared to the GT Neo 3T
- Limited camera details suggest a basic imaging experience
Realme GT Neo 3T
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 processor for smooth performance
- Ultra-fast 80W charging for quick top-ups
- Higher peak display brightness for better visibility
- Potentially higher price compared to the X30 Max
- Battery capacity not explicitly stated
- May run warmer under sustained heavy load
Display Comparison
The Realme GT Neo 3T boasts a measured peak brightness of 803 nits, suggesting a more vibrant and visible display in outdoor conditions compared to the Honor X30 Max, for which brightness data is unavailable. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED/OLED panels), the GT Neo 3T’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. The X30 Max’s larger size is its primary display advantage, but without brightness data, it’s difficult to assess its overall quality.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Realme GT Neo 3T, being positioned as a performance-focused device, likely benefits from more advanced image processing algorithms. The absence of details on the X30 Max’s camera suggests a more basic imaging experience, likely geared towards casual photography. We can assume both phones will have a standard set of camera modes, but the GT Neo 3T is expected to deliver superior image quality.
Performance
The Realme GT Neo 3T’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) significantly outpaces the Honor X30 Max’s MediaTek Dimensity 900 (6nm) in CPU and GPU performance. The Snapdragon 870’s octa-core configuration, with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, delivers a noticeable performance boost over the Dimensity 900’s 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the GT Neo 3T. The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 870 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 118 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite the Honor X30 Max’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the Realme GT Neo 3T’s 80W wired charging is a game-changer. This allows for a significantly faster 0-100% charge time compared to the Honor X30 Max’s 22.5W charging. The GT Neo 3T can top up its battery in under 40 minutes, while the X30 Max will likely take well over an hour, making the GT Neo 3T more convenient for users who need a quick power boost.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X30 Max if you need a large screen for media consumption and prioritize value over raw performance. It's ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming. Buy the Realme GT Neo 3T if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience, especially for gaming and demanding applications, and if fast charging is a critical feature for your lifestyle.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 870 in the Realme GT Neo 3T still a capable processor in 2024?
Absolutely. The Snapdragon 870 remains a very capable processor, offering performance comparable to newer mid-range chips. It handles demanding games and applications with ease and provides a smooth, responsive user experience. It's a significant step up from the Dimensity 900 in the Honor X30 Max.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the Realme GT Neo 3T compared to the 22.5W charging on the Honor X30 Max?
The 80W charging on the GT Neo 3T is dramatically faster. While the X30 Max will likely take over an hour to fully charge, the GT Neo 3T can achieve a full charge in under 40 minutes. This difference is crucial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Will the Honor X30 Max struggle with graphically intensive games?
The Dimensity 900 in the Honor X30 Max can handle some gaming, but it will likely struggle with demanding titles at higher settings. You may need to lower graphics settings and resolution to achieve a playable frame rate. The Snapdragon 870 in the GT Neo 3T offers a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ Does the Realme GT Neo 3T overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 870 is generally efficient, but it can get warm during extended gaming. Realme likely incorporates thermal management solutions to mitigate overheating, but some throttling may occur during very long sessions. The 7nm process node helps to manage heat better than older nodes.
