The Honor X20 SE and X10 5G represent Honor’s commitment to delivering 5G connectivity at accessible price points. While both phones share a similar aesthetic and 22.5W charging, they diverge significantly in their core processing power, with the X10 5G boasting Huawei’s Kirin 820 5G chipset, while the X20 SE utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 700. This comparison will dissect these differences to determine which device offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly more refined chipset, the Honor X10 5G emerges as the winner. Its Kirin 820 5G offers a noticeable advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming, despite both phones sharing the same charging speed and similar overall feature sets. However, the X20 SE remains a compelling option for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79, 80, 84 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA) Cat12 600/50 Mbps, 5G 2.3 Gbps DL |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 30 | 2020, May 20. Released 2020, May 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 09 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Aluminosilicate glass) |
| Dimensions | 160.7 x 73.3 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 163.7 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.63 inches, 106.1 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 3x2.22 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.84 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Kirin 820 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 (6-core) |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 4.0 | Android 10, Magic UI 3.1, no Google Play Services |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 40 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 17mm, 120˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.2, 24mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired | 22.5W wired
5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Rose Gold, Silver | Blue, Orange, Black, Silver |
| Models | CHL-AN00 | TEL-AN00, TEL-TN00, TEL-AN00a, TEL-AN10 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Honor X20 SE
- Potentially better battery efficiency due to Dimensity 700 chipset.
- More affordable price point.
- Reliable 5G connectivity.
- Less powerful CPU and GPU compared to the X10 5G.
- May struggle with demanding games and applications.
- Image processing likely less advanced.
Honor X10 5G
- More powerful Kirin 820 5G chipset for smoother performance.
- Superior CPU architecture for multi-tasking.
- Potentially better image processing capabilities.
- Kirin 820 5G may consume more power.
- Likely a higher price tag than the X20 SE.
- May not offer a significant visual upgrade in everyday tasks.
Display Comparison
Both the Honor X20 SE and X10 5G likely feature LCD panels, typical for this price segment. While specific display specs like resolution and refresh rate aren't provided, the focus here is on processing power to drive the display. The Kirin 820 5G’s more powerful GPU could potentially handle slightly more complex visual rendering, though the difference will be minimal for typical usage. Bezels are expected to be similar on both devices, reflecting a focus on maximizing screen real estate within a budget.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset plays a role in image signal processing (ISP). The Kirin 820 5G’s ISP is likely more advanced than the Dimensity 700’s, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction in photos and videos. The X10 5G’s processing power allows for more complex computational photography algorithms. While both phones likely feature a standard array of lenses, the X10 5G’s superior processing capabilities will likely yield better overall image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor X10 5G’s Kirin 820 5G (7nm) features a more complex CPU configuration: 1x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x2.22 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x1.84 GHz Cortex-A55. This contrasts with the X20 SE’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The Kirin 820’s inclusion of *three* high-performance Cortex-A76 cores provides a clear advantage in multi-threaded workloads and sustained performance. While both are 7nm chips, the architectural differences translate to a more responsive experience on the X10 5G, particularly when multitasking or running demanding apps. The X10 5G will likely exhibit less throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both devices share the same 22.5W wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds – approximately 1 hour to fully charge. The actual battery capacity isn’t specified, but the Dimensity 700 is generally more power-efficient than the Kirin 820 5G. This means the X20 SE *could* offer slightly longer battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity, due to the less demanding chipset. However, the difference is unlikely to be substantial, and real-world usage will be the deciding factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor X20 SE if you need a reliable 5G smartphone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming, and prioritize affordability. Buy the Honor X10 5G if you prefer a smoother experience with more demanding applications, enjoy mobile gaming, and value the slightly more powerful processing capabilities of the Kirin 820 5G chipset.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Honor X10 5G handle graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile at high settings?
The Kirin 820 5G is capable of running PUBG Mobile at high settings, though you may experience some frame drops during intense firefights. The GPU is significantly more powerful than the Dimensity 700, offering a smoother gaming experience overall. However, sustained performance may be limited by thermal throttling.
❓ Does the Honor X20 SE support carrier aggregation for faster 5G speeds?
While the Mediatek Dimensity 700 supports 5G, the extent of its carrier aggregation capabilities isn't explicitly stated. It likely supports at least some level of carrier aggregation, but the Honor X10 5G, with its Kirin 820 5G, may offer broader compatibility with different 5G bands and aggregation combinations, potentially leading to faster speeds in certain areas.
❓ Is the 22.5W charging speed sufficient for quick top-ups throughout the day?
22.5W charging is relatively standard for this price range. While not the fastest charging available, it's sufficient to provide a significant charge boost in a short amount of time – approximately 30-50% charge in 30 minutes. Both phones will offer similar charging times given the identical wattage.
