The Honor View40 and vivo X60 Pro+ represent distinct approaches to the flagship smartphone experience. The View40, powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 1000+, aimed for a balance of performance and affordability. The X60 Pro+, with its Snapdragon 888, targeted the high-end with a focus on camera capabilities and raw power. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and sustained performance, the vivo X60 Pro+ is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 888, despite potential thermal concerns, offers a more powerful and consistent experience than the Dimensity 1000+ in the Honor View40. However, the View40’s faster charging and potentially lower price make it a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 22 | 2021, January 21 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2021, January 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, eco leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 158.6 x 73.4 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.89 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1236 x 2676 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~439 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~91.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10, 120Hz, 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 10, with Google Play Services (unconfirmed) | Android 11, Funtouch 12 (International), OriginOS 1.0 (China) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom
32 MP, f/2.1, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
48 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, gimbal OIS, PDAF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚, 17mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, 720p@1920fps, HDR, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Color spectrum sensor | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min
50W wireless, 50% in 35 min
5W reverse wired | 55W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Rose Gold, Titanium Silver | Orange, Emperor Blue |
| Models | - | V2056A, V2047 |
| Price | - | About 800 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.80 W/kg (head) 0.47 W/kg (body) |
Honor View40
- Extremely fast 66W wired charging
- 50W wireless charging support
- Potentially lower price point
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Dimensity 1000+ chipset is less powerful than Snapdragon 888
- Limited information on camera capabilities
- Unknown battery capacity
vivo X60 Pro+
- Powerful Snapdragon 888 processor
- Excellent 91-hour endurance rating
- High peak display brightness (816 nits)
- Advanced camera system focused on photo and video
- Slower 55W wired charging compared to View40
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
- Likely higher price point
Display Comparison
The vivo X60 Pro+ boasts a measured peak brightness of 816 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the Honor View40, whose brightness is not specified. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the X60 Pro+'s higher peak brightness provides a tangible advantage for outdoor use. The absence of refresh rate data for the View40 means we can't assess smoothness, but the X60 Pro+ likely offers a smoother experience if it includes a high refresh rate panel.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X60 Pro+ is clearly positioned as a camera-centric device, though specific sensor details are missing. The focus on 'Photo / Video' suggests a more refined and versatile camera system. While the Honor View40’s camera specs are unavailable, the X60 Pro+’s Snapdragon 888 ISP (Image Signal Processor) offers advanced computational photography capabilities, potentially resulting in superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The X60 Pro+ likely benefits from more sophisticated image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor sizes.
Performance
The vivo X60 Pro+’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) holds a significant architectural advantage over the Honor View40’s Dimensity 1000+ (7nm). The Snapdragon 888’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.84 GHz, delivers superior single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and UI navigation. While the Dimensity 1000+’s Cortex-A77 cores are capable, the 5nm process of the Snapdragon 888 translates to better power efficiency and potentially less thermal throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The X60 Pro+ will likely maintain higher frame rates for longer periods.
Battery Life
The vivo X60 Pro+ boasts an endurance rating of 91 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the Honor View40’s battery capacity is unknown, its charging speeds are a major highlight: 66W wired (0-60% in 15 minutes, 100% in 35 minutes) and 50W wireless (50% in 35 minutes). The X60 Pro+ offers 55W wired charging, which is competitive but slower. The View40’s wireless charging capability is a significant advantage, and its reverse wired charging adds further versatility. The X60 Pro+'s longer endurance suggests a more efficient chipset and software optimization.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor View40 if you need exceptionally fast charging – 66W wired and 50W wireless – and prioritize a lower upfront cost. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and don’t demand the absolute highest performance. Buy the vivo X60 Pro+ if you prefer a more capable camera system, smoother gaming, and a flagship experience without compromise, even if it means slightly slower charging and a potentially higher price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 888 in the vivo X60 Pro+ experience significant thermal throttling during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 888 is known to generate more heat than some of its predecessors. While the vivo X60 Pro+ likely incorporates cooling solutions, users may experience some throttling during extended gaming sessions, potentially leading to reduced frame rates over time. However, the X60 Pro+'s overall performance still surpasses the Dimensity 1000+ even with some throttling.
❓ How does the 66W charging on the Honor View40 compare to real-world charging speeds with a standard charger?
The Honor View40’s 66W charging requires a compatible charger to achieve its advertised speeds. Using a standard charger will significantly increase charging times. The 66W charger can deliver a 60% charge in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 35 minutes, making it exceptionally convenient for quick top-ups.
❓ Is the camera on the vivo X60 Pro+ suitable for professional-level photography and videography?
While the specific camera specs are limited, the vivo X60 Pro+ is designed with photography and videography in mind. The Snapdragon 888’s ISP and likely high-quality sensors enable advanced features like HDR, low-light enhancement, and potentially 4K video recording. It's a strong contender for enthusiasts, but dedicated professionals may still prefer specialized equipment.
