Oppo Find X3 Pro vs Honor View40: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?

The Oppo Find X3 Pro and Honor View40 represent compelling options in the flagship Android space, though they arrived with different market strategies. The Find X3 Pro aimed for premium all-around excellence, while the View40 focused on delivering a high-end experience at a more accessible price point. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Oppo Find X3 Pro emerges as the stronger overall package. Its Snapdragon 888 chipset provides a performance edge, and the 81-hour endurance rating suggests superior battery optimization despite similar charging speeds. However, the Honor View40 remains a viable contender for budget-conscious users prioritizing fast charging.

PHONES
Phone Names Honor View40 Oppo Find X3 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bandsLTE1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International
5G bandsSA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
 -1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China
Launch
Announced2021, January 222021, March 11
StatusCancelledAvailable. Released 2021, March 19
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame
Dimensions163.1 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.93 x 0.31 in)163.6 x 74 x 8.3 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.33 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + eSIM
Weight189 g (6.67 oz)193 g (6.81 oz)
 -IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1236 x 2676 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~439 ppi density)1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density)
Size6.72 inches, 110.9 cm2 (~91.5% screen-to-body ratio)6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10, 120Hz, 800 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, BT.2020, 500 nits (typ), 1300 nits (peak)
 Always-on display-
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7 nm)Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)
GPUMali-G77 MC9Adreno 660
OSAndroid 10, with Google Play Services (unconfirmed)Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 8GB RAM256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
 UFS 2.1UFS 3.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDRColor spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF 3 MP, f/3.0, (microscope), AF, ring flash, 60x magnification
Triple50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚, 17mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro)-
Video4K, 1080p, 720p@1920fps, HDR, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video
Selfie camera
Dual16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) Color spectrum sensor-
FeaturesHDRPanorama
Single-32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Infrared portYes-
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSSGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging66W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min 50W wireless, 50% in 35 min 5W reverse wired65W wired, PD, 40% in 10 min 30W wireless, 100% in 80 min 10W reverse wireless
TypeLi-Po 4000 mAhLi-Po 4500 mAh
Misc
ColorsMidnight Black, Rose Gold, Titanium SilverGloss Black, Blue, White, Cosmic Mocha, Mars Edition, Photographer Edition
Models-CPH2173, PEEM00, OPG03
Price-About 200 EUR
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 81h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -25.4 LUFS (Very good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 656467 (v8) GeekBench: 3316 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Honor View40

  • Incredibly fast 66W wired charging
  • 50W wireless charging for convenient top-ups
  • Competitive price point for flagship features

  • Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ chipset is less powerful than Snapdragon 888
  • Limited detailed specifications available

Oppo Find X3 Pro

  • Snapdragon 888 delivers superior performance
  • Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
  • Excellent 81-hour battery endurance

  • Wireless charging is slower at 30W
  • Higher price tag compared to the Honor View40

Display Comparison

The Oppo Find X3 Pro boasts a brighter display, measured at 774 nits, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Honor View40 (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Find X3 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a more dynamic visual experience. The lack of detailed display specs for the View40 makes a direct comparison of color accuracy and refresh rate difficult, but the Find X3 Pro’s premium positioning suggests a more advanced panel.

Camera Comparison

Both devices are advertised as having strong camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. The Oppo Find X3 Pro likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 888, offering advanced computational photography capabilities. Without specific sensor size or aperture details for the Honor View40, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The Find X3 Pro’s focus on both photo and video suggests a more versatile camera experience, while the View40’s camera capabilities remain less defined.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo Find X3 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 (5nm) while the Honor View40 features the Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7nm). The Snapdragon 888’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.84 GHz, provides a significant performance advantage over the View40’s Cortex-A77 cores at 2.6 GHz. The 5nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 888 also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones feature ample RAM, the Snapdragon 888’s superior GPU will deliver a smoother gaming experience.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find X3 Pro achieves an impressive endurance rating of 81 hours, indicating excellent battery optimization despite a potentially similar battery capacity to the Honor View40 (capacity data unavailable). Both phones offer incredibly fast charging: 65W wired for the Oppo and 66W for the Honor. However, the Oppo’s 40% charge in 10 minutes is slightly slower than the Honor’s 60% in 15 minutes. The Find X3 Pro also supports 30W wireless charging, slower than the View40’s 50W, but the overall endurance suggests the Oppo manages power more efficiently.

Buying Guide

Buy the Honor View40 if you prioritize incredibly fast 66W wired and 50W wireless charging, and are comfortable with the Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ chipset. This phone is ideal for users who frequently top up their battery and want a vibrant display without breaking the bank. Buy the Oppo Find X3 Pro if you demand top-tier performance from the Snapdragon 888, a consistently bright and high-quality display reaching 774 nits, and a more refined overall experience, even if it comes at a higher cost.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 888 in the Oppo Find X3 Pro experience significant thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 888 is a powerful chip, it is known to generate heat. However, the Oppo Find X3 Pro’s thermal management system, combined with the 5nm fabrication process, helps mitigate throttling. Users report generally good sustained performance, though some throttling may occur during extremely demanding games over prolonged periods.
❓ How does the 66W charging on the Honor View40 compare to the 65W charging on the Oppo Find X3 Pro in real-world usage?
The Honor View40 charges slightly faster initially (60% in 15 minutes) compared to the Oppo Find X3 Pro (40% in 10 minutes). However, both phones offer incredibly rapid charging, and the difference in overall 0-100% charge time (35 minutes for Honor vs. unspecified for Oppo, but likely around 40-45 minutes) is relatively minor. Both provide a full charge within a reasonable timeframe.
❓ Is the lack of detailed camera specifications for the Honor View40 a major concern for photography enthusiasts?
Yes, the limited information regarding the View40’s camera sensors and apertures makes it difficult to assess its photographic capabilities. While the phone likely produces good images, it may not match the consistency and advanced features offered by the Oppo Find X3 Pro, which benefits from Qualcomm’s ISP and potentially superior sensor technology.