Honor View30 vs Oppo Find X2 Pro: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Features
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a consistently high-performing experience, the Oppo Find X2 Pro is the superior choice. Its 65W charging capability and Snapdragon 865 chipset offer tangible benefits. However, the Honor View30 presents a compelling value proposition for those seeking flagship features without the premium price tag.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor View30 | Oppo Find X2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, April 27 | 2020, March 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 165.2 x 74.4 x 8.8 mm (Ceramic) / 9.5mm (Leather) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 217 g (Ceramic) / 200 g (Leather) (7.05 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Yes | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.09 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.86 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 990 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, Magic UI 3, no Google Play Services | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 40 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.4, 16mm (ultrawide) | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 129mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@960fps, (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired, 70% in 30 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4260 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Midnight Black, Icelandic Frost, Sunrise Orange | Black, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition |
| Models | - | CPH2025, PDEM30, OPG01 |
| Price | - | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 593717 (v8) GeekBench: 13245 (v4.4), 3269 (v5.1) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor View30
- Potentially better value for money
- Solid 5G connectivity with Kirin 990
- Capable camera system
- Slower charging speeds (40W)
- Kirin 990 chipset may not match Snapdragon 865 performance
Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Ultra-fast 65W charging
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 865
- Brighter and potentially more advanced display
- Higher price point
- May not offer significantly better battery life despite faster charging
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X2 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 871 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the View30. While both offer an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for OLED panels), the Find X2 Pro’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. The Find X2 Pro’s display technology is likely to be more advanced, potentially including LTPO for variable refresh rates, though this isn’t explicitly stated. Bezels and color accuracy are not detailed in the provided data, but Oppo historically focuses on color calibration, suggesting a more accurate display experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are described as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. However, the camera experience is likely a key differentiator. While sensor sizes and apertures are unknown, the Oppo Find X2 Pro, being a flagship, likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The absence of detail regarding secondary cameras suggests neither phone heavily emphasizes features like macro photography. The Snapdragon 865’s image signal processor (ISP) is also more advanced, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Honor View30 utilizes the Kirin 990 (7nm) while the Oppo Find X2 Pro features the Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+). The Snapdragon 865’s Cortex-A77 cores (1x2.84 GHz & 3x2.42 GHz) represent an architectural improvement over the Kirin 990’s Cortex-A76 cores (2x2.86 GHz & 2x2.09 GHz), promising better single-core performance. Both chips share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores (4x1.86 GHz / 4x1.80 GHz). The '7nm+' process of the Snapdragon 865 suggests slightly improved efficiency and potentially higher clock speeds. While both support 5G, the Snapdragon 865’s modem is generally considered more mature and widely compatible.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 88 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite differing charging speeds. The Oppo Find X2 Pro’s 65W wired charging is a significant advantage, achieving a full charge in just 38 minutes. The Honor View30’s 40W charging, while respectable, takes longer to reach 70% in 30 minutes, implying a longer total charge time. The actual battery capacity (mAh) is not provided, but the faster charging of the Find X2 Pro mitigates any potential disadvantage from a smaller battery size.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor View30 if you need a capable 5G phone with a solid camera system and prioritize value for money. It’s ideal for users who don’t demand the absolute fastest performance or the quickest charging speeds. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Pro if you prefer a no-compromise experience, demanding the fastest charging (65W), consistently high performance from the Snapdragon 865, and a brighter, more vibrant display. This is the phone for power users and mobile photographers.