Honor View30 vs Huawei P40 Pro+: Which Kirin 990 Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Huawei P40 Pro+ is the superior device, justifying its higher price with a more advanced camera system, faster 5G connectivity via the Kirin 990 5G, and the convenience of 40W wireless charging. However, the Honor View30 remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing core performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor View30 | Huawei P40 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, April 27 | 2020, March 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, June 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, ceramic back, ceramic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 158.2 x 72.6 x 9 mm (6.23 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 226 g (7.97 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Yes | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1200 x 2640 pixels (~441 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.2 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.09 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.86 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 990 (7 nm) | Kirin 990 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Mali-G76 MP16 |
| OS | Android 10, Magic UI 3, no Google Play Services | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | Nano Memory (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica optics, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/4.4, 240mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 10x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 40 MP, f/1.8, 18mm (ultrawide), 1/1.54", PDAF TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Triple | 40 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.4, 16mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@960fps, (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720@7680fps, 1080p@960fps, HDR; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF IR TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Infrared Face ID, fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired, 70% in 30 min | 40W wired 40W wireless 27W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4200 mAh | Li-Po 4200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Midnight Black, Icelandic Frost, Sunrise Orange | White Ceramic, Black Ceramic |
| Models | - | ELS-N39, ELS-AN10 |
| Price | - | About 1000 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 95h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 529687 (v8) GeekBench: 3203 (v5.1) GFXBench: 31fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor View30
- More affordable price point
- Fast 40W wired charging
- Powerful Kirin 990 processor
- Lacks wireless charging
- Potentially inferior camera system
- Older Kirin 990 chipset
Huawei P40 Pro+
- Advanced camera system
- 40W wired and wireless charging
- Kirin 990 5G for faster connectivity
- 27W reverse wireless charging
- Higher price
- Potentially more complex software
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both devices lack detailed display specifications in the provided data, but the P40 Pro+ boasts a measured peak brightness of 760 nits, suggesting a more vibrant and visible screen in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the P40 Pro+’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) indicates superior black levels and overall image quality. The View30’s display performance is likely good, but the P40 Pro+ has a clear advantage in visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
The P40 Pro+’s camera is its defining feature, though specific sensor details are absent. The 'Photo / Video' designation indicates a focus on both aspects, and the P40 Pro+’s position as a premium device suggests a more sophisticated camera system with larger sensors and advanced image processing. The View30, while capable, likely prioritizes a more balanced camera experience without the P40 Pro+’s flagship-level capabilities. The absence of details on the View30’s camera makes a direct comparison difficult, but the P40 Pro+ is expected to deliver superior image quality and versatility.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Kirin 990, but the P40 Pro+ utilizes the Kirin 990 5G, featuring a slightly tweaked CPU configuration with 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 cores compared to the View30’s 2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. This difference, coupled with the 5G modem integration, suggests the P40 Pro+ is optimized for sustained performance and network speeds. While the View30’s higher clock speeds *might* offer a marginal boost in single-core tasks, the P40 Pro+’s 5G capabilities and potentially improved thermal management give it an edge in real-world usage.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 95 hours, indicating comparable battery life despite differing capacities (not specified). However, the P40 Pro+ offers significantly more charging flexibility with 40W wired, 40W wireless, and 27W reverse wireless charging. The View30 is limited to 40W wired charging, making the P40 Pro+ a more convenient option for users who frequently utilize wireless charging or need to top up other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor View30 if you need a powerful Kirin 990 experience without the premium price tag, and prioritize fast 40W wired charging over wireless convenience. Buy the Huawei P40 Pro+ if you demand the best possible camera performance, benefit from 5G connectivity, and value the added flexibility of 40W wireless and 27W reverse wireless charging.