Honor View30 Pro vs. Sony Xperia 1 III: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Features
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing value and fast charging, the Honor View30 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Kirin 990 5G offers strong performance, and its 40W wired and 27W wireless charging significantly outpace the Xperia 1 III's 30W wired charging. However, the Xperia 1 III's superior display and refined camera experience justify its higher price for content creators and enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor View30 Pro | Sony Xperia 1 III |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA (specific) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, April 27 | 2021, April 14 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, August 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 165 x 71 x 8.2 mm (6.50 x 2.80 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 186 g / 187.1 g (mmWave) (6.56 oz) |
| - | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Yes | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1644 x 3840 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~643 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 98.6 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| - | Runs at 1096 x 2560 pixels except for select use cases | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 990 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 10, Magic UI 3, no Google Play Services | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.X | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 40 MP, f/1.6, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1.4µm, AF | 12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 70mm (telephoto), f/2.8, 105mm (telephoto), 1/2.9", dual pixel PDAF, 3x/4.4x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.6", dual pixel PDAF 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@960fps, (gyro-EIS) | 4K@24/25/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| - | Native Sony Alpha camera support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired, 70% in 30 min 27W wireless, 52% in 30 min Reverse wireless | 30W wired, PD, 50% in 30 min Wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4100 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Midnight Black, Icelandic frost, Sunrise Orange | Frosted Black, Frosted Gray, Frosted Purple |
| Models | - | XQBC62/V, XQBC52V.UKCX, SO-51B, SOG03, A101SO, XQ-BC62, XQ-BC72, XQ-BC52, XQ-BC01, XQ-BC11, XQ-BC21, XQ-BC72 |
| Price | - | € 505.26 / $ 903.43 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 82h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 607423 (v8) GeekBench: 3515 (v5.1) GFXBench: 54fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor View30 Pro
- Significantly faster wired and wireless charging
- More affordable price point
- 5G connectivity
- Older chipset (Kirin 990)
- Less refined camera system (likely)
- Display specs are less impressive
Sony Xperia 1 III
- Superior display quality and brightness
- More powerful Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Advanced camera features and image processing
- Slower charging speeds
- Higher price
- Potentially more prone to thermal throttling
Display Comparison
The Sony Xperia 1 III boasts a 620 nit peak brightness, providing excellent visibility outdoors, while the Honor View30 Pro's brightness is not specified. The Xperia 1 III's 'Infinite' contrast ratio suggests a true OLED panel, delivering deep blacks and vibrant colors. While the View30 Pro likely uses an OLED panel as well, the Xperia 1 III's display is geared towards professional content creators, offering color accuracy and potentially features like creator modes. The lack of refresh rate information for the View30 Pro is a drawback compared to the 120Hz likely found on the Xperia 1 III, impacting smoothness during scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are described as having capable photo/video systems, but the specifics differ. The Xperia 1 III likely features Sony's renowned image processing algorithms and a focus on manual controls, appealing to photography enthusiasts. The View30 Pro's camera performance is less well-defined, but its sensor size and lens apertures would be key differentiators. The absence of detailed camera specs for the View30 Pro makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Xperia 1 III's reputation for video quality and advanced features like 4K 120fps recording gives it a distinct edge. Ignoring the likely inclusion of low-resolution auxiliary cameras on both devices, the core imaging capabilities of the Xperia 1 III are likely more refined.
Performance
The Sony Xperia 1 III's Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Honor View30 Pro's Kirin 990 5G (7nm+). The Snapdragon 888's Cortex-X1 prime core delivers superior single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and UI navigation. The 5nm process node also translates to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the Kirin 990 is no slouch, the Snapdragon 888 offers a clear advantage in GPU performance, benefiting demanding games and graphically intensive applications. The Xperia 1 III's LPDDR5 RAM likely provides faster memory speeds than the View30 Pro's unspecified RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 82 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the View30 Pro). However, the charging speeds are where the Honor View30 Pro shines. Its 40W wired charging can reach 70% in 30 minutes, while the Xperia 1 III only manages 50% in the same timeframe. The View30 Pro also offers 27W wireless charging, significantly faster than the Xperia 1 III's wireless charging capabilities. The inclusion of reverse wireless charging on both devices adds convenience, but the View30 Pro's faster charging speeds provide a more practical benefit for users on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor View30 Pro if you need a fast-charging, 5G-enabled phone with solid performance at a significantly lower price point. It's ideal for everyday users, gamers who don't demand the absolute highest frame rates, and those who value convenience. Buy the Sony Xperia 1 III if you prioritize a top-tier display for media consumption, a more sophisticated camera system with advanced video features, and a premium build quality, and are willing to pay a premium for these features.