Honor View30 Pro vs Oppo Find X2 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and a superior display, the Oppo Find X2 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset and 871 nit display offer a smoother, more visually immersive experience. However, the Honor View30 Pro remains a compelling option for budget-conscious users who value fast charging and 5G connectivity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor View30 Pro | Oppo Find X2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, April 27 | 2020, March 06 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2020, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 165.2 x 74.4 x 8.8 mm (Ceramic) / 9.5mm (Leather) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 217 g (Ceramic) / 200 g (Leather) (7.05 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Yes | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.86 GHz Cortex-A76 & 2x2.36 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Kirin 990 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10, Magic UI 3, no Google Play Services | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 40 MP, f/1.6, 27mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), 1/4.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide), 1.4µm, AF | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 129mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@960fps, (gyro-EIS) | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 40W wired, 70% in 30 min 27W wireless, 52% in 30 min Reverse wireless | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4100 mAh | Li-Po 4260 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ocean Blue, Midnight Black, Icelandic frost, Sunrise Orange | Black, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition |
| Models | - | CPH2025, PDEM30, OPG01 |
| Price | - | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 593717 (v8) GeekBench: 13245 (v4.4), 3269 (v5.1) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor View30 Pro
- Faster wireless charging (27W)
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- More affordable price point
- Kirin 990 chipset is less powerful than Snapdragon 865
- Display specs are less impressive than Oppo
Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 865
- Brighter and higher-quality display
- Faster wired charging (65W)
- Higher price tag
- Lacks wireless charging and reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find X2 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 871 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the Honor View30 Pro. While both utilize 7nm+ fabrication, the Oppo’s display also benefits from an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting a superior OLED panel. This translates to deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The Honor’s display specs are less detailed, making it difficult to assess its color accuracy or HDR capabilities relative to the Oppo.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having strong photo and video capabilities, but specifics are limited. The Oppo Find X2 Pro likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 865, known for its excellent image processing. Without sensor size details for either device, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Oppo’s history suggests a focus on natural-looking images, while Honor often employs more aggressive image processing. The absence of details regarding OIS or lens apertures further complicates a direct comparison.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Honor View30 Pro features the Kirin 990 5G, while the Oppo Find X2 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G. Both are 7nm+ chips, but the Snapdragon 865’s Cortex-A77 prime core (2.84 GHz) offers a slight architectural advantage over the Kirin 990’s Cortex-A76 (2.86 GHz). The Snapdragon 865 also benefits from Qualcomm’s Adreno 650 GPU, providing superior graphics performance. While the Kirin 990 is no slouch, the Snapdragon 865 is generally considered the more powerful and thermally efficient chipset, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 88 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite unspecified battery capacities. However, the charging speeds differ dramatically. The Oppo Find X2 Pro’s 65W SuperVOOC 2.0 charging can fully charge the device in just 38 minutes, a significant advantage over the Honor View30 Pro’s 40W wired charging (70% in 30 minutes). The Honor also offers 27W wireless charging (52% in 30 minutes) and reverse wireless charging, features not explicitly mentioned for the Oppo.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor View30 Pro if you need a capable 5G phone with incredibly fast wired and wireless charging, and are willing to accept some potential compromises in raw processing power and display quality. Buy the Oppo Find X2 Pro if you prioritize a premium display experience, top-tier performance from the Snapdragon 865, and a more polished camera system, and are willing to pay a premium for it.