Honor continues to deliver stylish and feature-packed smartphones at competitive prices. The Honor V40 Lite and Honor 50 Lite are two popular options, but which one offers the best value? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their key differences to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor V40 Lite edges out the Honor 50 Lite thanks to its significantly more powerful chipset (Dimensity 800U) and faster charging speeds overall. While the Honor 50 Lite boasts a sleeker design, the V40 Lite provides a better balance of performance and features for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 23 | 2021, October 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 28 | Available. Released 2021, November 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 74.1 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.92 x 0.30 in) | 161.8 x 74.7 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169 g (5.96 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2376 pixels (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.57 inches, 106.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.1 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, HDR10, 90Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | - |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) | - |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | - |
| OS | Android 10, Magic UI 4.0, no Google Play Services | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, Panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚, 17mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚, 17mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 4K | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min
5W reverse wired | 66W wired, 40% in 10 min |
| Type | Li-Po 3800 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Green | Midnight Black, Space Silver, Deep Sea Blue |
| Models | ALA-AN70 | NTN-L22, NTN-LX1, NTN-LX3 |
| Price | About 390 EUR | About 160 EUR |
Honor V40 Lite
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 800U)
- Faster charging speeds overall
- Likely better gaming performance
- Reverse wired charging
- Potentially less modern design
- Camera might not be as advanced as the 50 Lite
Honor 50 Lite
- Sleeker, more modern design
- Potentially improved camera system
- Lighter and more compact
- Less powerful chipset
- Slightly slower charging
- May struggle with demanding tasks
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature OLED displays with a 6.5-inch size and a 60Hz refresh rate. The Honor 50 Lite might have a slightly more modern design with thinner bezels, but the core display technology is likely similar. Expect vibrant colors and decent viewing angles on both.
Camera Comparison
The Honor 50 Lite is expected to have a more modern camera setup, potentially with a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing. Both phones likely feature a multi-lens system including a main lens, ultrawide, and macro lens. Low-light performance and video recording quality will be key differentiators.
Performance
This is where the Honor V40 Lite shines. Its Dimensity 800U chipset is considerably more powerful than the likely chipset in the Honor 50 Lite (likely a Dimensity 900 series). Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the V40 Lite. The 50 Lite will be adequate for everyday tasks but may struggle with demanding games.
Battery Life
Both phones offer 66W fast charging, which is impressive. The Honor V40 Lite's charging times (60% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min) are slightly faster than the Honor 50 Lite's (40% in 10 min), suggesting a slightly more efficient charging algorithm or potentially a larger battery capacity (though this is unconfirmed). Battery capacity is likely around 4300-4500 mAh for both.
Buying Guide
The Honor V40 Lite is ideal for users who prioritize performance, gaming, and fast charging. It's a great choice for those seeking a powerful mid-range phone. The Honor 50 Lite is better suited for users who value aesthetics, a lighter design, and a more streamlined experience, but are less concerned about raw processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Honor V40 Lite good for gaming?
Yes, the Honor V40 Lite's Dimensity 800U chipset makes it a capable gaming phone, handling most games smoothly at medium to high settings.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
While both have similar battery capacities, the Honor V40 Lite's slightly faster charging and potentially more efficient charging algorithm give it a slight edge in overall battery performance.
