Honor V40 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+: A Head-to-Head Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 888 chipset, built on a more efficient 5nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage in demanding tasks and gaming, despite the slower 33W charging. However, the Honor V40 5G’s superior charging speeds are a significant benefit for those prioritizing convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor V40 5G | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 22 | 2021, February 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 22 | Available. Released 2021, March 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1236 x 2676 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 110.4 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10, 120Hz, 800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 10, Magic UI 4.0, no Google Play Services | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚, 17mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, 720p@1920fps, HDR, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) Color spectrum sensor | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min 50W wireless, 50% in 35 min 5W reverse wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4520 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Rose Gold, Titanium Silver | Black, White, Aurora |
| Models | YOK-AN10 | - |
| Price | About 460 EUR | About 470 EUR |
Honor V40 5G
- Blazing-fast 66W wired charging
- Impressive 50W wireless charging
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Dimensity 1000+ chipset is outperformed by Snapdragon 888
- Potentially less efficient than the 5nm Snapdragon
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+
- Powerful Snapdragon 888 5G chipset
- More efficient 5nm fabrication process
- Superior ISP for improved image processing
- Significantly slower 33W charging
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load (though 5nm helps)
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays (data not provided), the core difference lies under the hood. The Redmi K40 Pro+ benefits from the Snapdragon 888’s superior image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to better image processing and display calibration. The Honor V40’s Dimensity 1000+ is capable, but the 5nm process of the Snapdragon 888 offers a more efficient foundation for display driving. Without specific display specs, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Snapdragon 888’s ISP gives the Redmi K40 Pro+ an edge.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Snapdragon 888’s ISP in the Redmi K40 Pro+ provides a significant advantage in image processing, potentially resulting in better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality. The Honor V40’s Dimensity 1000+ ISP is competent, but lacks the advanced features and processing power of the Snapdragon counterpart. The Redmi K40 Pro+ is likely to excel in low-light photography and video recording due to the superior ISP.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+’s Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm) is the clear winner in terms of raw processing power. Its Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.84 GHz, significantly outperforms the Honor V40 5G’s Cortex-A77 cores (2.6 GHz). The 5nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 888 also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. While the Dimensity 1000+ is a capable chip, the Snapdragon 888 offers a substantial performance uplift, particularly in GPU-intensive tasks. The Redmi K40 Pro+ will deliver a smoother experience in demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
The Honor V40 5G dominates in charging speed. Its 66W wired charging can reach 100% in 35 minutes, and the 50W wireless charging is exceptionally fast. The Redmi K40 Pro+’s 33W wired charging, while supporting PD3.0 and QC3, takes a considerably longer 52 minutes to fully charge. However, the Snapdragon 888’s 5nm process is more power-efficient, potentially offsetting the Honor V40’s faster charging in real-world usage. Users prioritizing minimal downtime will strongly favor the Honor V40 5G, while those focused on overall efficiency may find the Redmi K40 Pro+ sufficient.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor V40 5G if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging – both wired and wireless – and value a balanced, smooth user experience over peak performance. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones throughout the day. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ if you prioritize raw processing power for gaming, video editing, or other demanding applications, and are willing to trade some charging speed for a more efficient and powerful chipset.