OnePlus 9 Pro vs Honor V40 5G: Which Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus 9 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 888 chipset provides a performance edge, and while battery life is comparable, the 9 Pro’s refined software and camera system offer a more polished experience. However, the Honor V40 5G’s faster wired charging is a significant advantage for those prioritizing speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor V40 5G | OnePlus 9 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 28, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - CN | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 22 | 2021, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 22 | Available. Released 2021, March 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 74.3 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 163.2 x 73.6 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.90 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1236 x 2676 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~440 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 110.4 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10, 120Hz, 800 nits (peak) | LTPO Fluid2 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Always-on display | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1000+ (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 10, Magic UI 4.0, no Google Play Services | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 77mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, AF 2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome) |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚, 17mm (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K, 1080p, 720p@1920fps, HDR, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) Color spectrum sensor | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 60% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min 50W wireless, 50% in 35 min 5W reverse wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 29 min 50W wireless, 100% in 43 min 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight Black, Rose Gold, Titanium Silver | Morning Mist, Forest Green, Stellar Black |
| Models | YOK-AN10 | LE2121, LE2125, LE2123, LE2120, LE2127 |
| Price | About 460 EUR | € 246.17 / $ 264.95 / £ 287.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 86h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.1 LUFS (Very good) |
Honor V40 5G
- Faster overall performance with Snapdragon 888
- Potentially superior camera system with Hasselblad partnership
- Refined software experience
- Higher peak display brightness
- Slower wireless charging compared to Honor V40 5G
- Charging speed is still very good, but not class-leading
OnePlus 9 Pro
- Incredibly fast 66W wired charging
- Faster 50W wireless charging
- Competitive performance with Dimensity 1000+
- Potentially lower price point
- Dimensity 1000+ is less powerful than Snapdragon 888
- Camera system details are limited
Display Comparison
While both phones feature high-quality displays, the OnePlus 9 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 859 nits, suggesting a more visible screen in direct sunlight. The Honor V40 5G’s display specifications are not provided, but Honor typically employs OLED panels with vibrant colors. The OnePlus 9 Pro’s display technology is likely to be more advanced, potentially including LTPO for variable refresh rates, contributing to improved power efficiency. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both devices, reflecting current flagship design trends.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed with strong camera capabilities, but details are limited. The OnePlus 9 Pro’s camera system, developed in partnership with Hasselblad, likely emphasizes color accuracy and dynamic range. The Honor V40 5G’s camera specifications are not detailed enough to make a direct comparison, but it’s reasonable to assume it features a multi-lens setup. The OnePlus 9 Pro’s image processing algorithms are likely more refined, offering better low-light performance and more advanced features like computational photography. The absence of specific sensor size information for the Honor V40 5G makes a definitive assessment difficult, but the OnePlus 9 Pro’s focus on image quality suggests a larger, more capable sensor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus 9 Pro’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) demonstrably outperforms the Honor V40 5G’s Dimensity 1000+ (7nm) in raw processing power. The Snapdragon 888’s Cortex-X1 prime core, clocked at 2.84 GHz, provides a significant boost in single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and smooth multitasking. The Dimensity 1000+’s Cortex-A77 cores, while capable, are less efficient. Both phones utilize octa-core CPUs, but the architectural advantages of the Snapdragon 888 translate to a more fluid user experience, particularly in demanding applications and games. The OnePlus 9 Pro is also likely to benefit from better GPU performance, enhancing gaming visuals.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 86 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the Honor V40 5G). However, the charging speeds are where they diverge significantly. The Honor V40 5G’s 66W wired charging can reach 60% in 15 minutes and 100% in 35 minutes, while the OnePlus 9 Pro’s 65W wired charging takes 29 minutes to reach 100%. The Honor V40 5G also offers 50W wireless charging (50% in 35 minutes), significantly faster than the OnePlus 9 Pro’s 50W wireless charging (100% in 43 minutes). This makes the Honor V40 5G the clear winner for users who prioritize charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor V40 5G if you prioritize incredibly fast charging – its 66W wired and 50W wireless capabilities are class-leading. This phone is ideal for users who frequently top up their battery and want to minimize downtime. Buy the OnePlus 9 Pro if you value consistent performance, a more versatile camera system, and a smoother software experience. It’s the better choice for power users, mobile gamers, and photography enthusiasts.