Honor V Purse vs. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5: A Deep Dive into Foldable Futures
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw power, a long-lasting battery, and a polished software experience, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 is the clear winner. However, the Honor V Purse presents a compelling alternative for those seeking a distinctive design and a more affordable entry point into the foldable world.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor V Purse | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 45, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, September 19 | 2023, July 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, September 19 | Available. Released 2023, August 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 156.5 x 135.6 x 4.3 mmFolded: 156.5 x 74.7 x 8.6 mm | Unfolded: 154.9 x 129.9 x 6.1 mmFolded: 154.9 x 67.1 x 13.4 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 214 g (7.55 oz) | 253 g (8.92 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2016 x 2348 pixels (~401 ppi density) | 1812 x 2176 pixels (~373 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.71 inches, 189.5 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.6 inches, 183.2 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, 1600 nits (peak) | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.36 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, MagicOS 7.2 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 66mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@60fps, 1080p@60/240fps (gyro-EIS), HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 4 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 2.0µm, under display Cover camera: 10 MP, f/2.2, 24mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 35W wired 5W reverse wired | 25W wired, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Blue | Icy Blue, Phantom Black, Cream, Gray, Blue |
| Models | VCA-AN00 | SM-F946B, SM-F946B/DS, SM-F946U, SM-F946U1, SM-F946N, SM-F946W, SM-F9460 |
| Price | About 770 EUR | € 660.00 / $ 607.00 / £ 520.69 / ₹ 86,000 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.24 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
Honor V Purse
- Unique and stylish design
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Faster 35W wired charging
- Mid-range Snapdragon 778G processor
- Likely inferior battery life
- Limited camera capabilities (assumed)
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Excellent battery life (12:01h active use)
- Bright and vibrant display (1257 nits)
- Higher price tag
- Slower 25W wired charging
- Larger and heavier form factor
Display Comparison
The Galaxy Z Fold5 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1257 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight – a crucial advantage for outdoor use. While the Honor V Purse’s display specs are not provided, its focus on aesthetics suggests a prioritization of color accuracy and style over sheer brightness. The Z Fold5’s likely use of LTPO technology dynamically adjusts refresh rates, conserving battery life, a feature not confirmed for the V Purse. The Z Fold5’s larger internal display also provides a more immersive experience for multitasking and media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs for the Honor V Purse are unavailable, but given its positioning, we can expect a focus on social media-friendly image quality. The Galaxy Z Fold5’s camera system, while not detailed in the provided data, benefits from Samsung’s extensive image processing expertise and likely includes features like optical image stabilization (OIS) for sharper photos and videos. The Z Fold5’s larger sensor size (assumed, based on Samsung’s flagship history) will capture more light, resulting in better low-light performance. We’ll refrain from analyzing 2MP macro lenses on either device, as their utility is limited.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 utilizes the Qualcomm SM8550-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm), while the Honor V Purse is equipped with the SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm). This translates to a significant performance gap. The 8 Gen 2’s Cortex-X3 prime core, clocked at 3.36 GHz, offers substantially higher single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and smooth UI navigation. The 4nm process node of the 8 Gen 2 also provides superior thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The V Purse’s 778G is a capable mid-range chip, but it will struggle with demanding tasks compared to the Z Fold5.
Battery Life
The Galaxy Z Fold5 achieves an impressive active use score of 12:01h and an endurance rating of 95h, indicating excellent battery life. While the Honor V Purse’s battery capacity is unknown, its 35W wired charging is faster than the Z Fold5’s 25W, potentially offering quicker top-ups. However, the Z Fold5’s larger battery and more efficient chipset likely result in a longer overall usage time. The Z Fold5 also supports 15W wireless charging, a convenience the V Purse lacks.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor V Purse if you prioritize a unique, eye-catching design and are comfortable with a mid-range processor for everyday tasks and social media. Buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 if you demand top-tier performance for demanding applications, extended battery life for all-day use, and a more mature foldable experience with robust software support.