Choosing between a tablet and a phone can be tough, especially when both offer compelling features. We're pitting the Honor Tablet V7 Pro, a mid-range tablet, against the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G, a popular 5G smartphone, to see which one comes out on top. This comparison will help you decide which device best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X4 Pro 5G wins overall due to its significantly faster charging, smartphone versatility, and competitive price. While the V7 Pro offers a larger screen for media consumption, the Poco's performance and charging speed make it a more practical daily driver for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G - cellular model only | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, August 13 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 19 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 252.1 x 163.4 x 7.3 mm (9.93 x 6.43 x 0.29 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 485 g (1.07 lb) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | Stylus support | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Aluminosilicate glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~274 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 300 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT8797 Kompanio 1300T (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Magic UI 5.0 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS - cellular model only | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 22.5W wired, 100% in 125 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 7250 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gold, Blue, Silver | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 330 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Tablet V7 Pro
- Large, immersive display
- Potentially good for media consumption
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Slower charging speed
- Unknown battery capacity
- Potentially weaker performance compared to Poco X4 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Fast charging (67W)
- 5G connectivity
- Good overall performance
- Excellent battery life (119h endurance)
- More versatile form factor (smartphone)
- Smaller display compared to tablet
- Nominal contrast ratio description is vague
Display Comparison
Both devices boast impressive displays with a nominal 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The Honor V7 Pro's larger 11.5-inch screen provides a more immersive viewing experience for videos and games. The Poco X4 Pro 5G's 6.67-inch display is more pocketable and suitable for one-handed use. Resolution and refresh rate details are needed for a more precise comparison.
Camera Comparison
The Poco X4 Pro 5G likely holds an advantage in the camera department. While both are described as 'Photo / Video', the Poco's Snapdragon chipset typically includes a more capable image signal processor (ISP). Expect better image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance from the Poco. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are needed for a more detailed analysis.
Performance
The Poco X4 Pro 5G's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset generally outperforms the Kompanio 1300T in the Honor V7 Pro. While both are octa-core processors, the Snapdragon's architecture and optimization provide a smoother and more responsive user experience, especially for demanding apps and games. The V7 Pro's chipset is adequate for everyday tasks but may struggle with heavier workloads.
Battery Life
The Poco X4 Pro 5G's battery life is rated at an impressive 119 hours of endurance, suggesting excellent longevity. The Honor V7 Pro's battery capacity is unknown, but its 22.5W charging speed is considerably slower than the Poco's 67W charging, which can fully charge the phone in under an hour.
Buying Guide
The Honor Tablet V7 Pro is ideal for users prioritizing a large screen for media consumption, reading, or light productivity tasks. The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is best for those needing a versatile smartphone with 5G connectivity, fast charging, and a good camera system for everyday use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Honor V7 Pro good for gaming?
While the V7 Pro's large screen is appealing for gaming, its chipset might struggle with demanding titles. The Poco X4 Pro 5G offers better performance for smoother gameplay.
❓ Which device is better for taking photos?
The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is likely the better choice for photography due to its more capable chipset and potentially better camera hardware.
