The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor Power and Samsung Galaxy A55 represent compelling options for users seeking a balance of features and affordability. The Honor Power aggressively targets performance with a newer Snapdragon chipset and rapid charging, while the Galaxy A55 focuses on a refined user experience and strong battery endurance. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the Honor Power is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 offers a noticeable edge in gaming and demanding tasks. However, the Samsung Galaxy A55 excels in sustained battery life and boasts a brighter, more vibrant display, making it ideal for media consumption and everyday use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 15 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 18 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.7 x 8 mm (6.44 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~437 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 4000 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
5 MP, (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L1+L5) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired
5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 8000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gold | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | DVD-AN00 | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Honor Power
- Faster Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 processor
- 66W SuperCharge for rapid charging
- Potentially better thermal management
- Display brightness likely lower than A55
- Camera details currently unknown
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Excellent battery life (13:27h active use)
- Bright and vibrant 1010 nit display
- Established Samsung software ecosystem
- Slower 25W charging
- Exynos 1480 may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1010 nits, compared to an expected (but unconfirmed) lower peak brightness on the Honor Power. This makes the A55 far more usable outdoors in direct sunlight. While the Honor Power's panel specifics are unknown, Samsung's Super AMOLED technology generally delivers superior color accuracy and contrast. The A55's display is likely to offer a more immersive viewing experience, though the Honor Power may compensate with a higher refresh rate (speculation based on market trends).
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the Honor Power, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Galaxy A55's image processing is known for its vibrant, sometimes oversaturated, look. The Honor Power, leveraging Qualcomm's ISP, is likely to lean towards more natural color reproduction. Sensor size and aperture are crucial, and without that data for the Honor Power, it's difficult to assess its low-light performance. The A55 likely benefits from Samsung's established camera algorithms and software features. We can assume both phones will include a standard suite of camera modes, but the A55's image processing will be the defining factor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor Power utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm), while the Galaxy A55 features the Exynos 1480 (also 4nm). The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 employs a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A715 cores – compared to the A55’s Cortex-A78 cores. This translates to better single-core performance and improved efficiency. The Snapdragon's Adreno GPU will also provide a more substantial graphics boost for gaming. While both are 4nm chips, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is expected to offer superior thermal management, reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The A55's CPU configuration (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) prioritizes clock speed, but the Snapdragon's architecture is more efficient.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55 demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving 13 hours and 27 minutes of active use. The Honor Power’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 66W wired charging significantly outpaces the A55’s 25W charging. This means the Honor Power can replenish its battery much faster, potentially mitigating any capacity disadvantage. A full charge on the Honor Power is expected to take under an hour, while the A55 will require considerably longer. The faster charging is a significant convenience factor for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Power if you need a phone for mobile gaming, frequently transfer large files, or value the convenience of incredibly fast 66W charging. You'll benefit from the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3's processing power. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prioritize all-day battery life, a bright and color-accurate display for streaming and browsing, and the established Samsung ecosystem with its software support and features.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1480 in the Galaxy A55 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1480 is known to throttle under sustained heavy load, meaning performance can decrease over time during extended gaming. While it's not a severe overheating issue, users engaging in long gaming sessions may experience frame drops. The Honor Power's Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is expected to manage thermals more effectively.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Honor Power with its 66W charging?
With 66W SuperCharge, the Honor Power is expected to charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 45-55 minutes, significantly faster than the Galaxy A55's 25W charging. This makes it ideal for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture (Cortex-A715 vs Cortex-A78) noticeable in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing and social media, the difference is minimal. However, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3's Cortex-A715 cores offer a performance advantage in more demanding applications like video editing, multitasking, and graphically intensive games. The A715 cores are more efficient, leading to better overall responsiveness.
❓ What kind of software updates can Galaxy A55 users expect from Samsung?
Samsung is known for its robust software support. The Galaxy A55 is expected to receive at least four years of major Android OS updates and five years of security patches, ensuring long-term software support and security.
