Honor Power vs. Google Pixel 7a: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a emerges as the stronger choice. Its superior camera system, coupled with Google’s software experience and AI capabilities, provides a more polished and versatile experience. However, the Honor Power’s significantly faster 66W charging is a major advantage for those prioritizing convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Honor Power | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 15 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 18 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.7 x 8 mm (6.44 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Scratch/drop-resistant glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1224 x 2700 pixels (~437 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 4000 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15, MagicOS 9 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 5 MP, (ultrawide) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L1+L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 5W reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 8000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Gold | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | DVD-AN00 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Honor Power
- 66W SuperCharge delivers incredibly fast charging.
- Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 offers efficient performance.
- 5W Reverse Wired Charging for accessories.
- Camera system likely lags behind the Pixel 7a.
- Display specifications are unknown, potentially lower brightness.
Google Pixel 7a
- Exceptional camera quality with Google’s image processing.
- Tensor G2 provides AI-powered features and smooth performance.
- Guaranteed software updates and a clean Android experience.
- Slow 18W charging.
- Less efficient chipset compared to the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3.
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, offering excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the Honor Power’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be lower, potentially impacting outdoor usability. The Pixel 7a’s OLED panel delivers vibrant colors and deep blacks, a standard in this price range. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rates are likely fixed, impacting battery efficiency during dynamic content viewing.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a is renowned for its camera capabilities, leveraging Google’s computational photography expertise. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, the Pixel’s image processing excels in dynamic range and low-light performance. The Honor Power’s camera specifications are not detailed enough to make a direct comparison, but it’s unlikely to match the Pixel 7a’s image quality without Google’s software enhancements. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also likely superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s image signal processor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 (5nm) utilizes a Cortex-X1 prime core for peak performance, designed for demanding tasks and AI processing. The Honor Power’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) employs Cortex-A715 cores, offering a balance of performance and efficiency. While the Tensor G2 has higher clock speeds on its prime cores (2.85 GHz vs 2.63 GHz), the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 benefits from a more modern architecture and a smaller process node, potentially leading to better sustained performance and thermal management during prolonged gaming. The Pixel 7a’s older Cortex-A78 cores are less efficient than the A715 cores in the Honor Power.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating solid battery life. However, its 18W wired charging is significantly slower than the Honor Power’s 66W charging. The Honor Power can likely achieve a full charge in under an hour, while the Pixel 7a will take considerably longer. The Honor Power also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Pixel 7a, allowing it to top up accessories. While the Pixel 7a’s battery endurance is respectable, the Honor Power’s charging speed provides a substantial convenience advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Power if you need blazing-fast charging and prioritize sustained performance during extended gaming sessions thanks to the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s thermal efficiency. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value computational photography, a clean Android experience with guaranteed updates, and the benefits of Google’s AI-driven features like Magic Eraser and Call Screen.