The Honor Play9T and vivo V19 Neo represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone space. While both rely on Qualcomm silicon, they diverge significantly in chipset generation and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences, helping you determine which device best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor Play9T emerges as the stronger choice. Its newer Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) chipset delivers demonstrably better performance and efficiency than the older Snapdragon 675 (11nm) in the vivo V19 Neo, despite the latter's slightly faster charging being a minor benefit.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 06 | 2020, June 13. Released 2020, June 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, September 06 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.9 x 76.8 x 8.1 mm (6.57 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) | 159 x 74.2 x 8.5 mm (6.26 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g or 199 g (6.95 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1610 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~261 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 14, Magic OS 8 | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 23mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity (ultrasound), compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 35W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Admiral Blue, Crystal White |
| Models | ALT-AN00 | - |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 320 EUR |
Honor Play9T
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 4 Gen 2)
- More efficient 4nm fabrication process
- Faster 35W charging
- Potentially better future-proofing
- Display specifications unknown
- Camera details not available
vivo V19 Neo
- Slightly faster charging (relative to older standards)
- Established Snapdragon 675 ISP
- Potentially lower price point
- Familiar software experience
- Older and less efficient 11nm chipset
- Slower CPU and GPU performance
- Less responsive user experience
- Limited future-proofing
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given their price points, both likely feature LCD panels. However, the Honor Play9T's newer chipset suggests a higher probability of supporting a higher refresh rate (90Hz or 120Hz) than the vivo V19 Neo. The 11nm Snapdragon 675 would struggle to efficiently power a high refresh rate display. Color accuracy is likely similar, with both targeting the sRGB color space.
Camera Comparison
Without sensor details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Snapdragon 675 in the vivo V19 Neo includes a dedicated image signal processor (ISP) that was considered competitive in its time. The newer Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the Honor Play9T also has an ISP, but its capabilities are less well-documented. The real-world difference will likely be in image processing algorithms and software optimization. We can assume both phones will feature a primary camera, ultrawide, and potentially a depth sensor, but image quality will depend heavily on the sensor resolution and lens aperture, which are currently unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor Play9T’s Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) is a significant leap forward. The 4nm fabrication process inherently provides better power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the vivo V19 Neo’s Snapdragon 675 (11nm). The Play9T’s CPU, with its Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, will outperform the Kryo 460 Gold cores (2.0 GHz) in the V19 Neo in CPU-intensive tasks. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 also benefits from newer CPU architecture, translating to better single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Honor Play9T.
Battery Life
The Honor Play9T features 35W wired charging, significantly faster than the vivo V19 Neo’s 18W charging. This means the Play9T will achieve a 0-100% charge in considerably less time. While battery capacity isn't specified, the more efficient 4nm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the Play9T will likely deliver comparable or better battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity than the V19 Neo. The faster charging speed of the Play9T is a substantial advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Honor Play9T if you prioritize sustained performance for gaming, multitasking, and future-proofing. The 4nm process node ensures better thermal management and power efficiency. Buy the vivo V19 Neo if you absolutely require the fastest possible charging times and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and are willing to compromise on processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the Honor Play9T handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is a capable chipset for mid-range gaming. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it should handle PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The 4nm process will also help mitigate thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions, providing a more consistent experience than the Snapdragon 675.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the vivo V19 Neo still considered fast charging in 2024?
18W charging was considered fast charging a few years ago, but it's now relatively slow compared to the 33W, 67W, or even 120W charging solutions available on newer smartphones. While it will still charge the phone overnight, it will take significantly longer than the Honor Play9T's 35W charging.
❓ How much of a real-world performance difference will I notice between the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 and Snapdragon 675?
You'll notice a significant difference in everyday tasks and multitasking. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2's newer architecture and higher clock speeds will result in snappier app launches, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive user interface. The difference will be particularly noticeable when switching between apps or running multiple apps simultaneously.
