The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders vying for your attention are the Honor Play7T Pro and the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro. Both offer compelling features, but cater to slightly different needs. Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison to help you decide which one is right for you.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro is the clear winner, boasting a significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, a brighter display, faster charging (wired and wireless), and a generally superior overall experience. The Play7T Pro offers a more budget-friendly option, but compromises on performance and features.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 28 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 06 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 74.5 x 7.4 mm (6.41 x 2.93 x 0.29 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 40W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min
30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Dark Green, Silver | Black, White |
| Models | DIO-AN00 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9)
GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Honor Play7T Pro
- More affordable
- Decent camera for the price
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Stylish design
- Less powerful chipset
- Lower display brightness
- Slower charging
- Limited gaming capabilities
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Flagship-level performance
- Bright and vibrant display
- Fast wired and wireless charging
- Excellent camera system
- Premium build quality
- Higher price
- Battery life, while good, isn't exceptional compared to some competitors
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro's display is a standout feature, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1059 nits and offering an infinite contrast ratio. This translates to vibrant colors, excellent visibility in sunlight, and a generally more immersive viewing experience. The Play7T Pro's display is likely adequate but lacks the same level of brightness and contrast. Expect a more standard mid-range display experience.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Poco F5 Pro is expected to have a superior camera system due to its more powerful processor and likely better image sensors. Expect better image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance from the Poco F5 Pro. The Play7T Pro's camera is likely adequate for casual photography.
Performance
Here, the Poco F5 Pro absolutely dominates. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a flagship-level chipset, offering significantly faster processing speeds and smoother multitasking compared to the Dimensity 6020 in the Play7T Pro. Gamers and those running demanding applications will notice a huge difference. The Play7T Pro is suitable for everyday tasks, but will struggle with more intensive workloads.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 99h. However, the Poco F5 Pro's faster 67W wired and 30W wireless charging gives it a significant advantage in terms of charging speed. You can get 50% charge in just 15 minutes with the Poco F5 Pro, while the Play7T Pro's 40W charging will take longer.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Honor Play7T Pro? Budget-conscious users prioritizing a decent camera and reliable performance for everyday tasks. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro? Power users, gamers, and those who demand a premium display, fast charging, and top-tier performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Honor Play7T Pro good for gaming?
The Play7T Pro can handle casual games, but its chipset isn't powerful enough for demanding titles or high graphics settings. The Poco F5 Pro is a much better choice for gamers.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones have a similar endurance rating, but the Poco F5 Pro's faster charging means you can top up the battery much quicker.
