The Honor Play7T Pro and X9a are both compelling budget smartphones vying for your attention. Both offer attractive features and competitive pricing, but which one truly comes out on top? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their key aspects to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor X9a edges out the Play7T Pro thanks to its slightly more efficient chipset and potentially better display technology. While both offer 40W charging, the X9a's Snapdragon 695 5G provides a smoother overall experience, especially for gaming and demanding apps. However, the Play7T Pro might offer slightly better value depending on pricing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 28 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 06 | Available. Released 2023, January 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 74.5 x 7.4 mm (6.41 x 2.93 x 0.29 in) | 161.6 x 73.9 x 7.9 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6020 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MagicOS 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 40W wired | 40W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5100 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Dark Green, Silver | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black |
| Models | DIO-AN00 | RMO-NX1 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 212.08 |
Honor Play7T Pro
- Clean and simple UI
- Good value for money (potentially)
- Decent battery life
- 40W fast charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Likely IPS LCD display
- Camera may be less impressive
- Performance may struggle with demanding games
Honor X9a
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Likely AMOLED display
- Potentially better camera system
- Smooth performance
- Slightly higher price
- Battery life might be marginally shorter
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.8-inch display, but the X9a is likely to have a slightly better panel (AMOLED vs. IPS LCD, assumed). The X9a's AMOLED display should offer deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better contrast. The Play7T Pro's display will be perfectly adequate for most users, but won't match the visual pop of the X9a.
Camera Comparison
The X9a likely has a more versatile camera system, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing. While specific megapixel counts are needed for a definitive comparison, the Snapdragon 695 often pairs well with capable camera software. The Play7T Pro's camera is expected to be adequate but may lack some of the advanced features and image quality of the X9a.
Performance
The Snapdragon 695 5G in the X9a generally outperforms the Dimensity 6020 in the Play7T Pro. The Kryo 660 cores in the Snapdragon are known for their efficiency and decent gaming performance. While both have octa-core CPUs, the X9a's chipset is more modern and optimized. Expect smoother multitasking and better app loading times on the X9a.
Battery Life
Both phones have a similar battery capacity (likely around 5000mAh, assumed). With 40W charging on both, charging times should be comparable. The X9a's more efficient chipset might translate to slightly better real-world battery life, but this will depend heavily on usage patterns.
Buying Guide
The Honor Play7T Pro is ideal for users prioritizing a clean UI and basic performance for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. The Honor X9a is a better choice for those who want a smoother experience, slightly better camera capabilities, and a more vibrant display, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Honor X9a is generally better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset.
❓ Does the Honor Play7T Pro have a good camera?
The Play7T Pro's camera is adequate for everyday photos, but the Honor X9a is likely to offer better image quality and more features.
